Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;126(4):999-1009.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-2032-2. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Genomewide markers as cofactors for precision mapping of quantitative trait loci

Affiliations

Genomewide markers as cofactors for precision mapping of quantitative trait loci

R Bernardo. Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

In composite interval mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL), subsets of background markers are used to account for the effects of QTL outside the marker interval being tested. Here, I propose a QTL mapping approach (called G model) that utilizes genomewide markers as cofactors. The G model involves backward elimination on a given chromosome after correcting for genomewide marker effects, calculated under a random effects model, at all the other chromosomes. I simulated a trait controlled by 15 or 30 QTL, mapping populations of N = 96, 192, and 384 recombinant inbreds, and N M = 192 and 384 evenly spaced markers. In the C model, which utilized subsets of background markers, the number of QTL detected and the number of false positives depended on the number of cofactors used, with five cofactors being too few with N = 384 and 20-40 cofactors being too many with N = 96. A window size of 0 cM for excluding cofactors maintained the number of true QTL detected while decreasing the number of false positives. The number of true QTL detected was generally higher with the G model than with the C model, and the G model led to good control of the type I error rate in simulations where the null hypothesis of no marker-QTL linkage was true. Overall, the results indicated that the G model is useful in QTL mapping because it is less subjective and has equal, if not better, performance when compared with the traditional approach of using subsets of markers to account for background QTL.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Genetics. 1999 Jul;152(3):1203-16 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1993 Sep;135(1):205-11 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):10972-6 - PubMed
    1. Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Feb;124(2):261-75 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 2008 Jun;179(2):1045-55 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources