Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 Apr;162(4):1025-9.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91309-z.

Intrauterine fetal growth in concordant twin gestations

Affiliations

Intrauterine fetal growth in concordant twin gestations

J F Rodis et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr.

Abstract

We longitudinally assessed intrauterine ultrasonic growth parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length) in 60 pairs of concordant twins. Head circumference to abdominal circumference and femur length to abdominal circumference ratios were calculated. Estimated fetal weight curves were created with the formula of Shepard et al., incorporating biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference, as well as that of Hadlock et al., incorporating femur length and abdominal circumference. Biparietal diameter was obtained in only 79% of fetuses, whereas femur length and abdominal circumference were obtained in 96% and 99% of fetuses, respectively. The intrauterine growth of abdominal circumference appears to be linear between 18 and 40 weeks, fitting the simple equation abdominal circumference = -4.5 + 0.97 gestational age (gestational age in weeks). The mean femur length to abdominal circumference ratio is 22.4 +/- 1.5 and appears to be gestational age independent between 20 and 40 weeks. The head circumference to abdominal circumference ratio decreases as gestational age advances in a linear fashion. Estimated fetal weight curves by the formulas of both Shepard et al. and Hadlock et al. fit second-order polynomial equations. Neither formula appears to be superior in estimating fetal weight in twin gestations, although that of Hadlock et al. can be used more frequently since biparietal diameter cannot always be obtained in both twins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources