Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Dec;53(6):612-9.
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.612.

Comparison of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of postoperative infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of postoperative infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery

Dagmar Oberhofer et al. Croat Med J. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: To assess diagnostic value of perioperative procalcitonin (PCT) levels compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in early detection of infectious complications following colorectal surgery.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 79 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. White blood cell count, CRP, and PCT were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, 3, 5, and patients were followed for postoperative complications. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP and PCT values on each day was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, with infectious complications as an outcome measure. ROC curves with the largest area under the curve for each inflammatory marker were compared in order to define the marker with higher diagnostic accuracy.

Results: Twenty nine patients (36.7%) developed infectious complications. CRP and PCT concentrations increased in the early postoperative period, with a significant difference between patients with and without complications at all measured postoperative times. ROC curve analysis showed that CRP concentrations on POD 3 and PCT concentrations on POD 2 had similar predictive values for the development of infectious complications (area under the curve, 0.746 and 0.750, respectively) with the best cut-off values of 99.0 mg/L for CRP and 1.34 μg/L for PCT. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP and PCT was highest on POD 5, however the cut-off values were not considered clinically useful.

Conclusion: Serial postoperative PCT measurements do not offer an advantage over CRP measurements for prediction of infectious complications following colorectal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations the day before surgery and on postoperative days (POD) 1-5 in patients with and without complications after colorectal surgery. The box represents 25th-75th percentiles and line within the box is the median value. P = 0.026 on POD 1, P = 0.002 on POD 2, P < 0.001 on PODs 3 and 5 (Mann-Whitney test). Asterisk indicates the group without complications n = 50; group with complications n = 29. Dagger indicates the group without complications n = 42; group with complications n = 27.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perioperative procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations in patients with and without complications after colorectal surgery. The box represents 25th-75th percentiles and line within the box is the median value. P = 0.003 on postoperative day (POD) 1, P ≤ 0.001 on PODs 2-5 (Mann-Whitney test). Asterisk indicates the group without complications n = 49; group with complications n = 29. Dagger indicates the group without complications n = 37; group with complications n = 21.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic accuracy of early postoperative (postoperative day [POD] 1-3) C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations with regard to infectious complications expressed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Comparison of ROC curves with the largest area under the curve for each biomarker on PODs 1-3 shows similar diagnostic accuracy of CRP on POD 3 and PCT on POD 2 with the area under the curve of 0.746 and 0.750, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicentric study. Arch Surg. 2005;140:278–83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.3.278. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreoni B, Chiappa A, Bertani E, Bellomi M, Orecchia R, Zampino M, et al. Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:73. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-73. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, et al. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2009;96:197–205. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ni Choileain, Redmond HP. Cell response to surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1132–40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1132. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitaka C. Clinical laboratory differentiation of infectious versus non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;351:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.08.018. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms