New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians
- PMID: 23275904
- PMCID: PMC3530812
- DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.06.10
New mucosal flap modification for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians
Abstract
Aim: To describe a simple modification of fashioning the mucosal flap for endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) in Asians and investigate its efficacy.
Methods: A total of 120 patients with unilateral primary chronic dacryocystitis (PCD) were randomized into two groups: the new shaped nasal mucosal flap group (group A) and the removed nasal mucosal flap group (group B). All patients underwent standard EES-DCR. Patients in group A were performed a new shaped nasal mucosal flap covering the bared bone around the opened sac and those in group B was removed the nasal mucosal flap uncovering the bared bone. Patients were followed up for one year. The occurrence of granulation tissue, the proliferation of scar tissue and success rate of EES-DCR was compared.
Results: In the present study, complete postoperative data were acquired from 54 patients in group A and from 57 patients in group B. During process of review, the occurrence of granulation tissue was at the ostium margins account for 15% (8/54) in group A and 39% (22/57) in group B (P<0.05). At the one-year review, scar tissue was present in 5 patients in group A compared with 18 in group B (P<0.05). The success rate of EES-DCR was 98% (53/54) in group A and 84% (48/57) in group B (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The simple modification of fashioning nasal mucosal flap can effectively cover the bared bone around the opened sac and reduce formation of granulation tissue, lessen the risk of scar tissue formation and closure of ostium, thus improve the success rate of EES-DCR in Asians.
Keywords: chronic dacryocystitis; endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy; mucosal flap.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparative Study of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with or without Preservation of Nasal Mucosal Flap.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):894-898. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04311-1. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38440443 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis.Eye (Lond). 2011 Jun;25(6):746-53. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.44. Epub 2011 Mar 11. Eye (Lond). 2011. PMID: 21394118 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of surgical outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with or without mucosal flaps.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Oct;36(5):555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009. PMID: 19297108
-
Evidence-based review of surgical practices in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction and other new indications.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;25(5):443-8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000084. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24979582 Review.
-
Influence of Surgical Techniques on Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul;165(1):14-22. doi: 10.1177/0194599820972677. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 33228432
Cited by
-
Comparative Study of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy with or without Preservation of Nasal Mucosal Flap.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;76(1):894-898. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04311-1. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 38440443 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic transnasal canaliculorhinostomy for refractory common canalicular obstruction with an unidentifiable lacrimal sac.Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 18;13(8):1238-1243. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.08.09. eCollection 2020. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32821677 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without mucosal flap-is there any difference?Eye (Lond). 2020 Aug;34(8):1449-1453. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0716-4. Epub 2019 Nov 25. Eye (Lond). 2020. PMID: 31767961 Free PMC article.
-
Update on lacrimal apparatus dysfunction associated with differentiated thyroid cancer after I-131 therapy.Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 23;44(1):257. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03192-9. Int Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38909080 Review.
References
-
- Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppä H. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(6):1106–1113. - PubMed
-
- Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, Kaltreider SA, Meyer DR, Camara JG. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2369–2377. - PubMed
-
- Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(1):69–72. - PubMed
-
- Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(1):76–83. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources