Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 11;173(3):210-8.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1216.

Communication and medication refill adherence: the Diabetes Study of Northern California

Affiliations

Communication and medication refill adherence: the Diabetes Study of Northern California

Neda Ratanawongsa et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):731

Abstract

Background: Poor medication refill adherence contributes to poor cardiometabolic control and diabetes outcomes. Studies linking communication between patients and health care providers to adherence often use self-reported adherence and have not explored differences across communication domains or therapeutic indications.

Methods: To investigate associations between patient communication ratings and cardiometabolic medication refill adherence, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 9377 patients in the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE), a race-stratified, random sample of Kaiser Permanente survey respondents. Eligible participants received 1 or more oral hypoglycemic, lipid-lowering, or antihypertensive medication in the 12 months preceding the survey. Communication was measured with a 4-item Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (CAHPS) score and 4 items from the Trust in Physicians and Interpersonal Processes of Care instruments. Poor adherence was classified as greater than a 20% continuous medication gap for ongoing medication therapies. Using modified least squares regression, we calculated differences in poor adherence prevalence for a 10-point decrease in CAHPS score and compared higher vs lower communication ratings on other items, adjusting for necessary sociodemographic and medical confounders derived from a directed acyclic graph.

Results: In this cohort, 30% had poor cardiometabolic medication refill adherence. For each 10-point decrease in CAHPS score, the adjusted prevalence of poor adherence increased by 0.9% (P=.01). Compared with patients offering higher ratings, patients who gave health care providers lower ratings for involving patients in decisions, understanding patients' problems with treatment, and eliciting confidence and trust were more likely to have poor adherence, with absolute differences of 4% (P=.04), 5% (P=.02), and 6% (P=.03), respectively. Associations between communication and adherence were somewhat larger for hypoglycemic medications than for other medications.

Conclusions: Poor communication ratings were independently associated with objectively measured inadequate cardiometabolic medication refill adherence, particularly for oral hypoglycemic medications. Future studies should investigate whether improving communication skills among clinicians with poorer patient communication ratings could improve their patients' cardiometabolic medication refill adherence and outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors had conflicts of interest, and the funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort identification of patients with diabetes who completed patient-provider communication ratings survey and were prescribed at least 1 cardiometabolic medication.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Directed acyclic graph. Using established rules, adjusting only for shaded covariates was necessary to estimate the direct effect of communication on adherence. Dashed arrows indicate causal relationships blocked by adjustment. No unblocked pathways (solid arrows) remain between communication and adherence.

Comment in

  • On the road to patient centeredness.
    Naik AD. Naik AD. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 11;173(3):218-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1229. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23277229 No abstract available.

References

    1. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(Suppl 1):S11–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerr EA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Klamerus ML, Subramanian U, Hogan MM, Hofer TP. The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(10):717–727. - PubMed
    1. Heisler M, Hogan MM, Hofer TP, Schmittdiel JA, Pladevall M, Kerr EA. When more is not better: Treatment intensification among hypertensive patients with poor medication adherence. Circulation. 2008;117(22):2884–2892. - PubMed
    1. Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Karter AJ, et al. Why don’t diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):588–594. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Ahmed AT, Schmittdiel JA, Selby JV. New prescription medication gaps: A comprehensive measure of adherence to new prescriptions. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(5 Pt 1):1640–1661. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types