Ethics of ongoing cancer care for patients making risky decisions
- PMID: 23277773
- PMCID: PMC3439236
- DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000622
Ethics of ongoing cancer care for patients making risky decisions
Abstract
Patients who decline conventional cancer therapy yet seek to continue follow-up while pursuing alternative therapy can pose an ethical challenge. The potential benefits and harms of an ongoing clinical relationship need be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Ongoing efforts at communicating, understanding the patient’s basis for decision making, and seeking to negotiate evidence-based care that is respectful of the patient’s preferences may improve outcomes.13 However, respect for the patient’s autonomy does not require support for inappropriate care and should not require that the oncologist check his or her professional judgment at the door.
References
-
- Siminoff LA, Step MM. A communication model of shared decision making: Accounting for cancer treatment decisions. Health Psychol. 2005;24:S99–S105. - PubMed
-
- Gostin LO. Deciding life and death in the courtroom: From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco—A brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the ‘right to die’. JAMA. 1997;278:1523–1528. - PubMed
-
- American Medical Association. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2011. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions With Annotations 2010-2011.
-
- DiGianni LM, Garber JE, Winer EP. Complementary and alternative medicine use among women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:34S–38S. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
