Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;48(4):1334-58.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12025. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

Use of emergency departments among working age adults with disabilities: a problem of access and service needs

Elizabeth K Rasch  1 , Stephen P Gulley, Leighton Chan
Affiliations

Use of emergency departments among working age adults with disabilities: a problem of access and service needs

Elizabeth K Rasch et al. Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between emergency department (ED) use and access to medical care and prescription medications among working age Americans with disabilities.

Data source: Pooled data from the 2006-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a U.S. health survey representative of community-dwelling civilians.

Study design: We compared the health and service utilization of two groups of people with disabilities to a contrast group without disability. We modeled ED visits on the basis of disability status, measures of health and health conditions, access to care, and sociodemographics.

Data extraction: These variables were aggregated from the household component, the medical condition, and event files to provide average annual estimates for the period spanning 2006-2008.

Principal findings: People with disabilities accounted for almost 40 percent of the annual visits made to U.S. EDs each year. Three key factors affect their ED use: access to regular medical care (including prescription medications), disability status, and the complexity of individuals' health profiles.

Conclusions: Given the volume of health conditions among people with disabilities, the ED will always play a role in their care. However, some ED visits could potentially be avoided if ongoing care were optimized.

Keywords: (MeSH): persons with disabilities; emergency medical services; health services accessibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative Distribution of Conditions across Analytic Groups Associated with the Majority of Emergency Department Visits: Pooled Annual Estimates MEPS 2006–2008Note. When describing the percentage of ED visits across groups associated with particular conditions, counts may exceed 100 percent as individuals could report more than one condition associated with an ED visit. “Injuries,” “symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions,” and “pregnancy” were reported in “Results” and not included in graph to improve legibility.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Covariate Adjusted, Weighted Mean Predicted ED Visits among Working Age Adults by Access to Medical Care, Disability Status, and Number of Chronic Conditions: Pooled Annual Estimates MEPS 2006–2008Note. Estimates are based upon a zero inflated negative binomial model of ED visits. In addition to number of chronic conditions and disability status, the model includes controls for sociodemographics, number of non-chronic health conditions, and insurance coverage status. For all three disability statuses and all four chronic condition levels, all differences between ED visits on the basis of access to medical care were significant at the p < .05 level. ADL, activities of daily living; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Afifi AA, Kotlerman JB, Ettner SL, Cowan M. “Methods for Improving Regression Analysis for Skewed Continuous or Counted Responses”. Annual Review of Public Health. 2007a;28:95–111. - PubMed
    1. Afifi AA, Morisky DE, Kominski GF, Kotlerman JB. “Impact of Disease Management on Health Care Utilization: Evidence from the “Florida: A Healthy State (FAHS)” Medicaid Program”. Preventive Medicine. 2007b;44(6):547–53. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2007. “MEPS household component statistical estimation issues” [accessed on January 8, 2011]. Available at http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/about_meps/workbook/WB-Weight_Estimat.pdf. - PubMed
    1. Altman BM. Population Survey Measures of Functioning: Strengths and Weaknesses. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
    1. Benjamin Y, Hochberg Y. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B. 1995;57(1):289–300.

Publication types