Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec;1275(1):101-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06787.x.

Biomarker development for myasthenia gravis

Affiliations
Review

Biomarker development for myasthenia gravis

Henry J Kaminski et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Biomarkers are defined as characteristics (e.g., proteins, RNA, single nucleotide polymorphisms, imaging) that are objectively measured and evaluated as indicators of pathogenic processes or pharmacologic responses to therapeutic intervention. Biomarkers are important in clinical trials where the robust biomarker reflects the underlying disease process in a sensitive and reliable manner. For myasthenia gravis (MG), acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific kinase antibodies, as well as single-fiber electromyography, serve as excellent biomarkers for diagnosis but do not adequately substitute for clinical evaluations to predict treatment response. New technologies are emerging that enable broad biomarker discovery in biological fluids. Biomarker evaluation is ideally done in the context of longitudinal clinical trials. The MGTX trial has collected plasma and serum for RNA and protein analysis and thymus, which will allow robust biomarker discovery. The ultimate goal will be to identify candidates for a reliable substitute for a clinically meaningful end point that is a direct measure of the effectiveness of a therapy in the context of a continuum of disease natural history and a patient's overall well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Butterfield LH, Palucka AK, Britten CM, et al. Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3064–3076. - PMC - PubMed
    1. [Sept 4, 2012]; http://www.biomarkersconsortium.org.
    1. Mendell JR, Csimma C, McDonald CM, et al. Challenges in drug development for muscle disease: a stakeholders’ meeting. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35:8–16. - PubMed
    1. Kola I. The State of Innovation in Drug Development. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2008;83:227–231. - PubMed
    1. Paul SM, Mytelka DS, Dunwiddie CT, et al. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2010;9:203–214. - PubMed

Publication types