Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;40(1):46-53.
doi: 10.1111/iji.12026. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

16(th) IHIW: immunogenomic data-management methods. report from the immunogenomic data analysis working group (IDAWG)

Affiliations

16(th) IHIW: immunogenomic data-management methods. report from the immunogenomic data analysis working group (IDAWG)

J A Hollenbach et al. Int J Immunogenet. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

The goal of the immunogenomic data analysis working group (IDAWG) is to facilitate the consistent analysis of HLA and KIR data, and the sharing of those data among the immunogenomic and larger genomic communities. However, the data management approaches currently applied by immunogenomic researchers are not widely discussed or reported in the literature, and the effect of different approaches on data analyses is not known. With ASHI's support, the IDAWG developed a 45 question survey on HLA and KIR data generation, data management and data analysis practices. Survey questions detailed the loci genotyped, typing systems used, nomenclature versions reported, computer operating systems and software used to manage and transmit data, the approaches applied to resolve HLA ambiguity and the methods used for basic population-level analyses. Respondents were invited to demonstrate their HLA ambiguity resolution approaches in simulated data sets. By May 2012, 156 respondents from 35 nations had completed the survey. These survey respondents represent a broad sampling of the Immunogenomic community; 52% were European, 30% North American, 10% Asian, 4% South American and 4% from the Pacific. The project will continue in conjunction with the 17th Workshop, with the aim of developing community data sharing standards, ambiguity resolution documentation formats, single-task data Management tools and novel data analysis methods and applications. While additional project details and plans for the 17th IHIW will be forthcoming, we welcome the input and participation in these projects from the histocompatibility and immunogenetics community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gobal distribution of respondants to data management practices survey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venn diagram illustrating the overlap of common methods used by laboratories for resolution of ambiguous HLA genotypes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bentley G, Higuchi R, Hoglund B, et al. High-resolution, high-throughput HLA genotyping by next-generation sequencing. Tissue Antigens. 2009;74:393–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodmer JG, Marsh SG, Albert ED, et al. Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 1991. WHO Nomenclature Committee for factors of the HLA system. Tissue Antigens. 1992;39:161–73. - PubMed
    1. Cano P, Klitz W, Mack SJ, Maiers M, Marsh SG, Noreen H, Reed EF, Senitzer D, Setterholm M, Smith A, Fernandez-Vina M. Common and well-documented HLA alleles: report of the Ad-Hoc committee of the american society for histocompatiblity and immunogenetics. Hum Immunol. 2007;68(5):392–417. - PubMed
    1. Holcomb CL, Hoglund B, Anderson MW. A multi-site study using high-resolution HLA genotyping by next generation sequencing. Tissue Antigens. 2011;77:206–217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollenbach JA, Mack SJ, Gourraud PA, Single RM, Maiers M, Middleton D, Thomson G, Marsh SG, Varney MD, Immunogenomics Data Analysis Working Group A community standard for immunogenomic data reporting and analysis: proposal for a STrengthening the REporting of Immunogenomic Studies statement. Tissue Antigens. 2011;78(5):333–44. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types