SIMPLE: implementation of recommendations from international evidence-based guidelines on caesarean sections in the Netherlands. Protocol for a controlled before and after study
- PMID: 23281646
- PMCID: PMC3547819
- DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-3
SIMPLE: implementation of recommendations from international evidence-based guidelines on caesarean sections in the Netherlands. Protocol for a controlled before and after study
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising worldwide. In the Netherlands, the most significant rise is observed in healthy women with a singleton in vertex position between 37 and 42 weeks gestation, whereas it is doubtful whether an improved outcome for the mother or her child was obtained. It can be hypothesized that evidence-based guidelines on CS are not implemented sufficiently. Therefore, the present study has the following objectives: to develop quality indicators on the decision to perform a CS based on key recommendations from national and international guidelines; to use the quality indicators in order to gain insight into actual adherence of Dutch gynaecologists to guideline recommendations on the performance of a CS; to explore barriers and facilitators that have a direct effect on guideline application regarding CS; and to develop, execute, and evaluate a strategy in order to reduce the CS incidence for a similar neonatal outcome (based on the information gathered in the second and third objectives).
Methods: An independent expert panel of Dutch gynaecologists and midwives will develop a set of quality indicators on the decision to perform a CS. These indicators will be used to measure current care in 20 hospitals with a population of 1,000 women who delivered by CS, and a random selection of 1,000 women who delivered vaginally in the same period. Furthermore, by interviewing healthcare professionals and patients, the barriers and facilitators that may influence the decision to perform a CS will be measured. Based on the results, a tailor-made implementation strategy will be developed and tested in a controlled before-and-after study in 12 hospitals (six intervention, six control hospitals) with regard to effectiveness, experiences, and costs.
Discussion: This study will offer insight into the current CS care and into the hindering and facilitating factors influencing obstetrical policy on CS. Furthermore, it will allow definition of patient categories or situations in which a tailor-made implementation strategy will most likely be meaningful and cost effective, without negatively affecting the outcome for mother and child.
Trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01261676.
Similar articles
-
Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 May 10;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-20. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010. PMID: 20459717 Free PMC article.
-
Haemorrhagia post partum; an implementation study on the evidence-based guideline of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG) and the MOET (Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma-course) instructions; the Fluxim study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jan 26;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010. PMID: 20102607 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions.Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00983-y. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32867791 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of individual provider characteristics and attitudes on caesarean section decision-making: a global review.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1587603. Epub 2019 Jun 17. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020. PMID: 31208243 Review.
Cited by
-
Implementing a Preeclampsia Prediction Model in Obstetrics: Cutoff Determination and Health Care Professionals' Adherence.Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):81-89. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889890. Epub 2019 Dec 2. Med Decis Making. 2020. PMID: 31789093 Free PMC article.
-
Open access intrapartum CTG database.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 13;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-16. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24418387 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Anesthetic Predictors on Postpartum Hospital Length of Stay and Adverse Events Following Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study in 840 Consecutive Parturients.Ochsner J. 2015 Fall;15(3):228-36. Ochsner J. 2015. PMID: 26412993 Free PMC article.
-
A Strategy for Classification of "Vaginal vs. Cesarean Section" Delivery: Bivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition of Cardiotocographic Recordings.Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 19;10:246. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00246. eCollection 2019. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30941054 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;35:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, Velazco A, Bataglia V, Langer A, Narváez A, Valladares E, Shah A, Campodónico L, Romero M, Reynoso S, de Pádua KS, Giordano D, Kublickas M, Acosta A. World Health Organization 2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group: Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335:1025–1036. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, Ruyan P. WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group: Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical