Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 3;6(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-6-1.

Pronuclear morphology evaluation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a retrospective clinical review

Alessia Nicoli  1 , Francesco Capodanno, Ilaria Rondini, Barbara Valli, Maria Teresa Villani, Daria Morini, Leonardo De Pascalis, Stefano Palomba, Giovanni Battista La Sala
Affiliations

Pronuclear morphology evaluation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a retrospective clinical review

Alessia Nicoli et al. J Ovarian Res. .

Abstract

Background: The assessment of the embryo quality is crucial to maintain an high pregnancy rate and to reduce the risk of multiple pregnancy. The evaluation of the pronuclear and nucleolar characteristics of human zygote have been proposed as an indicator of embryo development and chromosomal complement. The aim of the current study was to assess the role of pronuclear morphology evaluation in vitro fertilization (IVF) / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Methods: Retrospective clinical analysis on 755 non-elective transfers of only one embryo (ET). Embryo assessment was performed in days 1 and 2. Clinical and biological data were recorded and analyzed according to embryo and/or pronuclear morphology.

Results: Both pronuclear and embryo morphology were significantly related to clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates. No significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates was detected when the pronuclear and embryo morphology assessments were combined. Embryo morphology and maternal age were the only independent predictors of favorable outcome by logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions: Pronuclear evaluation is effective to select the best zygotes if ET is performed at day 1, whereas it did not improve the clinical outcomes when combined with embryo morphology evaluation in day 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alpha Scientist in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istambul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–1283. - PubMed
    1. Hardarson T, Ahlström A, Rogberg L, Botros L, Hillensjö T, Westlander G. et al.Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:89–96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der373. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uyar A, Seli E. Embryo assessment strategies and their validation for clinical use: a critical analysis of methodology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24:141–150. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328352cd17. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Greco N. Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:341–349. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00596-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scott L. Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:201–214. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61711-7. - DOI - PubMed