Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;3(1):12-9.
Epub 2010 Nov 19.

Oral manifestations of coeliac disease.: A clinical-statistic study

Affiliations

Oral manifestations of coeliac disease.: A clinical-statistic study

M Costacurta et al. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2010 Jan.

Abstract

AIM.: The aim of the clinical-statistic study was to evaluate the prevalence of the different oral manifestations in a sample of coeliac patients, in comparison with a control group of healthy subjects. Moreover, a second objective was to determine if the clinical oral examination is useful as a diagnostic tool of screening for atypical forms of coeliac disease (CD). METHODS.: The enrolment of 300 coeliac patients, aged between 4 and 13 years (mean age 8.16), was carried out at the Pediatric Dentistry Unit in patients sent from the Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit of the PTV Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata. The control group was composed of 300 healthy subjects, age-matched (mean age 8.29), enrolled from the Pediatric Dentistry Unit. The patients were examined for hard tissues (enamel hypoplasia, dental caries), soft tissues (recurrent aphthous stomatitis RAS, atrophic glossitis, geographic tongue) and delay dental eruption. Enamel defects were classified according to Aine's criteria, while dental caries was recorded as dmft/DMFT indices. Statistical analysis was carried out by using SPSS/PC+ Software. Differences between case and control groups were tested using Paired samples T-test, and Chi-Square Test, depending on the variable considered. The minimal level of significance of the differences was fixed at p≤0.05 for all the procedures. RESULTS.: Statistical differences between groups were observed for the prevalence of enamel defects (p=0.0001), RAS (p=0.005), delay in dental eruption (p=0.0001), but not for the prevalence of atrophic glossitis (p=0.664). Differences in symmetrical distribution and a chronologic coherence of enamel defects were statistically significant between CD and control groups (p=0.0001). Regarding dental caries, the coeliac patients had higher indexes of caries than healthy subjects, both in deciduous teeth (dmft 2.31±1.84 vs 1.42±1.13; p= 0.021) and permanent teeth (DMFT 2.97±1.74 vs 1.74±1.64; p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS.: The clinical oral examination should be considered a diagnostic tool for the characterization of subjects affected by silent-atypical forms of CD.

Obiettivi.: Lo scopo dello studio clinico-statistico è stato quello di valutare la prevalenza delle diverse manifestazioni orali in un campione di pazienti celiaci, in confronto con un gruppo di controllo di soggetti sani. Inoltre, un secondo obiettivo è stato quello di determinare se l’esame clinico orale è utile come strumento diagnostico di screening per le forme atipiche di malattia celiaca.

Metodi.: Presso il Reparto di Odontoiatria Pediatrica del Policlinico di Tor Vergata - Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, sono stati selezionati 300 pazienti celiaci, di età compresa tra i 4 e 13 anni (età media 8.16), inviati dal Reparto di Gastroenterologia Pediatrica e 300 soggetti sani come gruppo controllo, di età compresa tra i 4 e i 13 anni (età media 8.29).

Per ogni paziente sono stati esaminati i tessuti duri (ipoplasia dello smalto, patologia cariosa), i tessuti molli (stomatiti aftose ricorrenti, glossite atrofica, lingua a carta geografica) ed i ritardi di eruzione dentale. I difetti dello smalto venivano classificati dal grado I al grado IV in base alla classificazione di Aine, mentre per la patologia cariosa veniva calcolato l’indice dmft/DMFT.

L’analisi statistica è stata effettuata utilizzando il Software SPSS/PC+. Le differenze tra il campione dei casi ed il gruppo controllo venivano valutate utilizzando il T-Test ed il Chi-Square Test, a seconda della variabile considerata. Il livello minimo di significatività statistica è stato fissato a p0.05 per tutte le procedure.

Risultati.: Differenze statisticamente significative sono state osservate tra i due gruppi in rapporto alla prevalenza dei difetti dello smalto (p = 0.0001), delle stomatiti aftose ricorrenti (p = 0.005), dei ritardi dell’eruzione dentale (p = 0.0001), ma non per la prevalenza di glossite atrofica (p = 0.664). È stata osservata alta significatività nella distribuzione simmetrica e coerenza cronologica dei difetti dello smalto dei soggetti celiaci rispetto al gruppo controllo (p=0.0001).

Dall’analisi della frequenza della patologia cariosa, è risultato che i pazienti celiaci presentavano indice di carie più elevato rispetto ai soggetti sani, sia nei denti decidui (dmft 2.31 ± 1.84 vs 1.42 ± 1.13, p=0.021) che nei denti permanenti (DMFT 2.97 ± 1.74 vs 1.74 ± 1.64, p=0.0001).

Conclusioni.: L’esame clinico orale deve essere considerato un utile strumento diagnostico di screening per l’identificazione dei soggetti affetti da forme silenti-atipiche di malattia celiaca.

Keywords: coeliac disease; dental enamel hypoplasia; dental eruption delay; recurrent aphtous stomatitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fasano A, Araya M, Bhatnagar S, et al. Celiac disease Working Group, Federation of International Societies of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition consensus report on celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;47(2):214–9. - PubMed
    1. Schuppan D. Current concepts of celiac disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterol. 2000;119:234–42. - PubMed
    1. Schuppan D, Esslinger B, Dieterich W. Innate immunity and coeliac disease. Lancet. 2003;362:3–4. - PubMed
    1. Carlsson AK, Axelsson IE, Borulf SK, Bredberg AC, Ivarsson SA. Serological screening for celiac disease in healthy 2.5-year-old children in Sweden. Pediatrics. 2001;107:42–5. - PubMed
    1. Catassi C, Rätsch IM, Fabiani E, et al. High prevalence of undiagnosed coeliac disease in 5280 Italian students screened by antigliadin antibodies. Acta Paediatr. 1995 Jun;84(6):672–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources