Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr;16(4):501-7.
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs514. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?

Lars Niclauss et al. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Guidelines proposed bioprosthesis implantation for aortic valve disease if the patients were at least 65 years old at the time of surgery, with a trend towards even younger patients in recent years. Considering the adverse effects of lifetime anticoagulation, new biological valves (less prone to degeneration) and new technologies may lead patients and surgeons to different choices. Therefore, it is interesting to analyse the results of aortic bioprosthetic valve replacement in patients aged <65 years at the time of surgery.

Methods: From January 2000 to December 2010, 84 patients aged <65 years at the time of surgery had undergone an aortic bio-prosthetic valve replacement. A mid-term follow-up [(FU) mean FU time: 54.4 ± 39.2 months] was done in August 2011 in all patients (FU completeness: 100%). Results were compared with patients who had a mechanical prosthetic aortic valve replacement during the same period.

Results: The reoperation rate for structural valve degeneration (SVD) of bioprostheses was 6% and occurred exclusively among patients <56 years. Contraindications for anticoagulation determined the choice of a bioprosthesis among 83% of these patients. The personal preference to avoid anticoagulation was the leading cause in 68% of the older patients (56-65 years). Neurological complications occurred more frequently in the mechanical control group.

Conclusions: Reoperations for SVD after bioprosthesis implantation occurred exclusively among younger patients (<56 years), not suitable for systemic anticoagulation. Previous studies, together with our experience, are in favour of an age limit between 56 and 60 years, taking into consideration alternative transcatheter approaches to SVD treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Number of implanted bio- (A) and mechanical (B) prostheses during the last 10 years.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Cumulative survival and reoperation-free survival after bioprosthetic AVR.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, et al. Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:230–68. - PubMed
    1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC, Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2006;114:84–231. - PubMed
    1. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Barón-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1–S44. - PubMed
    1. Chikwe J, Filsoufi F, Carpentier AF. Prosthetic valve selection for middle-aged patients with aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:711–9. - PubMed
    1. Stoica S, Goldsmith K, Demiris N, Punjabi P, Berg G, Sharples L, et al. Microsimulation and clinical outcomes analysis support a lower age threshold for use of biological valves. Heart. 2010;96:1730–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources