Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr;143(4):993-999.
doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1055.

Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?

Adesua Y Okupa et al. Chest. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Presently, there is insufficient information to compare the value of daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires for assessing symptoms in relationship to asthma control in clinical trials. Daily symptom diaries are often burdensome to gather, incomplete, susceptible to fabrication, and of questionable reliability. There is also concern that retrospective symptom questionnaires may be subject to poor recall and may be insensitive.

Methods: To compare these two methods of assessing symptoms reporting, we analyzed data collected during the Best Add-on Therapy Giving Effective Responses (BADGER) trial. During the trial, asthma control in 182 children aged 6 to 17 years was assessed in two ways: (1) by asthma control days (ACDs) determined by manually recorded daily diary symptom and rescue medication use scores and (2) by monthly retrospective report of symptoms embedded within the age-appropriate version of the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Correlations between ACDs and ACT scores were analyzed, and the sensitivity of each method for measuring asthma control and determining the differential response among the three BADGER treatments was evaluated.

Results: Although validated using a 4-week recall period, ACT correlated better with daily diary information from the last 2 weeks of the 4-week recall (r = 0.46) than from the first 2 weeks (r = 0.34). In addition, clinically significant differential treatment responses were detected using ACDs but not ACT scores .

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that daily diaries used to determine ACDs can be a more sensitive tool than ACT for assessing differential treatment responses with respect to asthma control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. *During each period, patients received ICS plus one of three add-on treatments: ICS, long-acting β-agonist (LABA), or leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA). ACT = Asthma Control Test; c-ACT = Childhood Asthma Control Test; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlations between percent asthma control days and ACT. See Figure 1 legend for expansion of abbreviation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Association between greatest ACD differential response and ACT differential response in all children. Each data point is a difference between two treatment period averages. On the y-axis, the reference lines at −3 and +3 reflect the published clinically minimally important differences for the ACT. All points to the right of the vertical line represent a significant differential response on the basis of criteria used in the original Best Add-on Therapy Giving Effective Responses (BADGER) trial (ie, > 31 annualized ACD, which corresponds to 8.5% ACD). For threshold values of < 31 d, the observed relationships did not change significantly; therefore, the final analyses were based on the 31-d threshold. Correlation = 0.24. ACD = asthma control day. See Figure 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviation.

References

    1. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24(2):182-199 - PubMed
    1. Krishnan JA, Lemanske RF, Jr, Canino GJ, et al. Asthma outcomes: symptoms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(suppl 3):S124-S135 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lemanske RF, Jr, Mauger DT, Sorkness CA, et al. ; Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Step-up therapy for children with uncontrolled asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(11):975-985 - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2007.
    1. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(1):59-65 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances