Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?
- PMID: 23287844
- PMCID: PMC3616688
- DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-1055
Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?
Abstract
Background: Presently, there is insufficient information to compare the value of daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires for assessing symptoms in relationship to asthma control in clinical trials. Daily symptom diaries are often burdensome to gather, incomplete, susceptible to fabrication, and of questionable reliability. There is also concern that retrospective symptom questionnaires may be subject to poor recall and may be insensitive.
Methods: To compare these two methods of assessing symptoms reporting, we analyzed data collected during the Best Add-on Therapy Giving Effective Responses (BADGER) trial. During the trial, asthma control in 182 children aged 6 to 17 years was assessed in two ways: (1) by asthma control days (ACDs) determined by manually recorded daily diary symptom and rescue medication use scores and (2) by monthly retrospective report of symptoms embedded within the age-appropriate version of the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Correlations between ACDs and ACT scores were analyzed, and the sensitivity of each method for measuring asthma control and determining the differential response among the three BADGER treatments was evaluated.
Results: Although validated using a 4-week recall period, ACT correlated better with daily diary information from the last 2 weeks of the 4-week recall (r = 0.46) than from the first 2 weeks (r = 0.34). In addition, clinically significant differential treatment responses were detected using ACDs but not ACT scores .
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that daily diaries used to determine ACDs can be a more sensitive tool than ACT for assessing differential treatment responses with respect to asthma control.
Figures
References
-
- Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24(2):182-199 - PubMed
-
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2007.
-
- Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(1):59-65 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- HL064307,/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- M01-RR03186/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000427/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- HL064288/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR025780/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- T32AI007635/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HL064288/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HL064287/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR025011/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HL064305/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HL064295/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HL064313/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- UL1-RR025011/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- M01 RR003186/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HL064307/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- M01 RR000036/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AI007635/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- HL064287/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 HL064295/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR024992/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- HL064305/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- HL064313/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- M01 RR000051/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- M01-RR00051/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- M01-RR00036/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1-RR025780/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1-RR024992/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000448/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
