Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;100(2):145-51.
doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-1005-2. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

Preen gland removal increases plumage bacterial load but not that of feather-degrading bacteria

Affiliations

Preen gland removal increases plumage bacterial load but not that of feather-degrading bacteria

Gábor Arpád Czirják et al. Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

The preen gland is a holocrine sebaceous gland of the avian integument which produces an oily secretion that is spread on the plumage during preening. It has been suggested that birds may defend themselves against feather-degrading bacteria (FDB) and other potential pathogens using preen gland secretions. However, besides some in vitro studies, the in vivo bacterial inhibitory effects of the preen oil on the abundance of feather-associated bacterial species has not yet been studied in passerines. Here we tested the effect of gland removal on the abundance of FDB and other-cultivable bacterial loads (OCB) of male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Our results did not support earlier results on in vitro antibacterial activity of preen oil against FDB since the absence of the preen gland did not significantly affect their loads related to the control birds. In contrast, we found that preen gland removal led to higher loads of OCB. This result suggests that the antimicrobial spectrum of the preen oil is broader than previously thought and that, by reducing the overall feather bacterial loads, the preen gland could help birds to protect themselves against a variety of potentially harmful bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 27;5(10):e13555 - PubMed
    1. Acta Biol Hung. 2006 Sep;57(3):295-300 - PubMed
    1. Microb Ecol. 2010 Aug;60(2):373-80 - PubMed
    1. Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Jun;97(6):577-81 - PubMed
    1. J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Dec;63(3):229-38 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources