Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;17(2):115-21.
doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0288. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington's disease: the Australian results of The International RESPOND-HD study

Affiliations

Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington's disease: the Australian results of The International RESPOND-HD study

Anita M Y Goh et al. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: This study examines elements of genetic discrimination among an at-risk, clinically undiagnosed Huntington's disease (HD) population.

Methods: Sixty at-risk individuals, either positive or negative for the HD genetic mutation, completed a survey regarding their experiences of genetic discrimination, adverse and unfair treatment, and knowledge about existing laws and policies surrounding genetic discrimination.

Results: Sixty eight percent of participants reported feeling "Great benefit" from knowing their genetic test results. Reported benefits of knowledge included planning for the future, making decisions, and many individuals found meaning in active participation in the HD community and in advocating for themselves or families at risk for HD. Many individuals found personal meaning and a sense of community from knowledge of this information and from the ability to participate in research. Despite these positive feelings toward gene testing, results demonstrated that 33% of participants perceived experiences of genetic discrimination, which occurred repeatedly and caused great self-reported distress. Significantly, more gene-positive respondents reported experiencing incidents of genetic discrimination, compared to gene-negative respondents. At least 58 separate incidents of discrimination were reported, the number of incidents ranged from 1 to 10, with 45% of individuals (9/20 respondents) indicating more than one event. Of the most significant events of discrimination, 58% were related to insurance, 21% to employment, 16% to transactions of daily life, and 5% to relationships.

Conclusion: Results contribute toward validation of empirical data regarding genetic discrimination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alper JS. Geller LN. Barash CI, et al. Genetic discrimination and screening for hemochromatosis. J Public Health Policy. 1994;15:345–358. - PubMed
    1. Barlow-Stewart K. Keays D. Genetic discrimination in Australia. J Law Med. 2001;8:250. - PubMed
    1. Billings PR. Kohn MA. de Cuevas M, et al. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am J Hum Genet. 1992;50:476–482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bombard Y. Veenstra G. Friedman JM, et al. Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at-risk for Huntington's disease: a cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2009;338:b2175. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duff K. Paulsen JS. Beglinger LJ, et al. “Frontal” behaviors before the diagnosis of Huntington's disease and their relationship to markers of disease progression: evidence of early lack of awareness. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010;22:196–207. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources