Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jul;83(4):641-7.
doi: 10.2319/071712-584.1. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment

Katie C Julien et al. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the prevalence of white spot lesions (WSLs) on the anterior teeth and, secondarily, to evaluate risk factors and predictors.

Materials and methods: Digital photographs and records of 885 randomly chosen patients were evaluated before and after treatment. Chart information included gender, age, as well as banding and debanding dates. Fluorosis and oral hygiene before and after treatment were also evaluated. Preexisting and posttreatment WSLs were recorded and compared for all 12 anterior teeth. Risk ratios (RR) and absolute risk (AR) were calculated to determine the likelihood and risk of WSL formation.

Results: Overall, 23.4% of the patients developed at least one WSL during their course of treatment. Maxillary anterior teeth were affected more than mandibular teeth. The maxillary laterals and canines and the mandibular canines were the most susceptible. There was no significant difference in WSLs between genders. Fluorosis, treatment time in excess of 36 months, poor pretreatment hygiene, hygiene changes during treatment, and preexisting WSLs were all significantly (P < .05) related to the development of WSLs. The highest risk of developing WSLs was associated with preexisting WSLs (RR = 3.40), followed by declines in oral hygiene during treatment (RR = 3.12) and poor pretreatment oral hygiene (RR = 2.83).

Conclusions: Nearly 25% of the patients developed WSLs while in treatment, depending on fluorosis, treatment time, preexisting WSLs, and oral hygiene. Orthodontists need to be mindful of these risk factors when making treatment decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pretreatment photo depicting fluorosis. Fluorosis was defined as significant when it extended beyond the incisal edges and was evident on more than one tooth.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Pretreatment photo showing WSLs that did not change during treatment and thus were not counted (yellow arrows). (B) Posttreatment photo showing unchanged WSLs (yellow arrows) and WSLs that developed during treatment (blue arrows) and thus were counted.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) Pretreatment photo demonstrating preexisting WSLs (yellow arrows). (B) Posttreatment photo demonstrating preexisting WSLs that worsened during treatment and thus were counted (green arrows), as well as new WSLs (blue arrows).

References

    1. Ogaard B. White spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: mechanisms and fluoride preventive aspects. Semin Orthod. 2008;3:183–193.
    1. Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19 year olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:423–427. - PubMed
    1. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1982;81:93–96. - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1982;1:62–67. - PubMed
    1. Årtun J, Brobakken BO. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:229–234. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms