New management strategy for fluid resuscitation: quantifying volume in the first 48 hours after burn injury
- PMID: 23292589
- PMCID: PMC4118491
- DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182700965
New management strategy for fluid resuscitation: quantifying volume in the first 48 hours after burn injury
Abstract
This study evaluated a 24-hour resuscitation protocol, established a formula to quantify resuscitation volume for the second 24 hours, described the relationship between the first and second 24 hours, and identified which patients required high volumes. A protocol for patients with burn >15% TBSA was implemented in 2009. Initial fluid was based on the Parkland calculation and adjusted to meet a goal urine output. Protocol compliance was defined as appropriate fluid titration to maintain urine output. Resuscitation ratio in the second 24 hours was tabulated as total fluid /(evaporative loss + maintenance fluid + estimated colloid). Data were collected prospectively from 2009 to 2011. A Wilcoxon rank test compared differences between groups. Regression analyses analyzed volume administered. P < .05 was statistically significant. Forty patients with burn >15% TBSA met criteria for inclusion. Mean age, burn size, and resuscitation volumes in the first and second 24 hours (mean + SD) were 47+ 20.7 years, 29.9 + 14.6% TBSA, 7.4 + 3.7 ml/kg/% TBSA, and a ratio of 1.9 times expected volume (SD, 1.3), respectively. Protocol compliance was 34%. Intubation, older age, and increased narcotic administration correlated with higher resuscitation volumes. A higher resuscitation volume in the first 24 hours significantly correlated with a higher resuscitation volume in the second 24 hours (P < .001). In conclusion, there is a significant relationship between fluid administration in the first and second 24 hours of resuscitation; intubation, older age, and narcotics correlate with higher volumes. A formula for observed/expected volumes in the second 24 hours is total fluid/(evaporative loss + maintenance fluid +estimated colloid).
Figures







References
-
- Pruitt BA. Protection from excess resuscitation: “pushing the pendulum back.”. J Trauma. 2000;49:567–8. - PubMed
-
- Baxter CR, Shires GT. Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation of severe burns. Ann NY AcadSci. 1968;150:874–894. - PubMed
-
- Cartotto R, Zhou A. Fluid creep: The pendulum hasn't swung back yet! J Burn Care Res. 2010;31:551–558. - PubMed
-
- Saffle JL. The phenomenon of “fluid creep” in acute burn resuscitation. JBCR. 2007;28:382–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous