Reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring: a European view
- PMID: 23294797
- PMCID: PMC3570892
- DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600631
Reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring: a European view
Abstract
Different systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are available on the European market. There is no unlimited reimbursement for CGM use in any European country, but in some countries, reimbursement exists for certain clinical indications. The aim of this commentary is to describe the different reimbursement situations across Europe for this innovative but costly technology, as a prelude to establishing more uniform use. From the perspective of many scientists and clinicians, a number of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of real-time CGM versus self-monitoring of blood glucose, at least for hemoglobin A1c reduction. Nevertheless, according to many health care professionals and potential CGM users, national health services and health insurance organizations are reluctant to reimburse CGM. Imminent technological and manufacturing developments are expected to reduce the day-to-day costs of CGM.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.
References
-
- Huang ES, O’Grady M, Basu A, Winn A, John P, Lee J, Meltzer D, Kollman C, Laffel L, Tamborlane W, Weinzimer S, Wysocki T. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1269–1274. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Liebl A, Henrichs HR, Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Biermann E, Thomas A. Evidenz und Konsens für den klinischen Einsatz von CGM. Diabetes Stoffwechsel Herz. 2012;21:32–47.
-
- Solans M, Kotzeva A, Almazán C. Sistemas de monitorización continua de glucosa en tiempo real. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. AIAQS Núm. 2010/06
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
