Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;20(3):507-13.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0370-3.

Free recall enhances subsequent learning

Affiliations

Free recall enhances subsequent learning

Kathleen M Arnold et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Testing, or retrieval practice, has become a central topic in memory research. One potentially important effect of retrieval practice has received little attention, however: It may enhance, or potentiate, subsequent learning. We introduce a paradigm that can measure the indirect, potentiating effect of free recall tests on subsequent learning, and then test a hypothesis for why tests may have this potentiating effect. In two experiments, the benefit of a restudy trial was enhanced when prior free recall tests had been taken. The results from a third, correlational study suggested that this effect might be mediated by the effect of testing on organization. Not only do encoding conditions affect later retrievability, but also retrieval attempts affect subsequent encoding effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Designs of Experiments 1 and 2. Each row represents a between- participants condition. S = study trial. T = test trial. Subscripts indicate the number of pictures studied.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of items recalled on the final test in Experiment 1. Mean difference between the restudy and no restudy conditions for each test condition are displayed above the respective bars. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adjusted means indicating the proportion of items recalled on the final test in Experiment 2. Adjusted mean difference between the restudy and no restudy conditions for each test condition are displayed above the respective bars. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scatterplot of the proportion of words recalled on the final test given that they had not been recalled on any previous test for each participant in Exp. 3 graphed as a function of ARC scores from the test prior to the restudy trial.

References

    1. Arnold KM, McDermott KB. Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (in press) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donaldson W. Output effects in multitrial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1971;10:577–585.
    1. Grimaldi PJ, Karpicke JD. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory and Cognition 2012 - PubMed
    1. Hays MJ, Kornell N, Bjork RA. When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition 2012 - PubMed
    1. Hintzman DL. Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory and Cognition. 2004;32:336–350. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources