Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;19(6):e383-91.
doi: 10.3747/co.19.1078.

Population-based home care services in breast cancer: utilization and costs

N Mittmann  1 , P K Isogai, R Saskin, N Liu, J M Porter, M C Cheung, N B Leighl, J S Hoch, M E Trudeau, W K Evans, K N Dainty, C C Earle
Affiliations

Population-based home care services in breast cancer: utilization and costs

N Mittmann et al. Curr Oncol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine utilization and costs of home care services (hcs) for individuals with a diagnosis of breast cancer (bc).

Methods: Incident cases of invasive bc in women were extracted from the Ontario Cancer Registry (2005-2009) and linked with other Ontario health care administrative databases. Control patients were selected from the population of women never diagnosed with any type of cancer. The types and proportions of hcs used were determined and stratified by disease stage. Attributable home care utilization and costs for bc patients were determined. Factors associated with hcs costs were assessed using regression analysis.

Results: Among the 39,656 bc and 198,280 control patients identified (median age: 61.6 years for both), 75.4% of bc patients used hcs (62.1% stage i; 85.7% stage ii; 94.6% stage iii; 79.1% stage iv) compared with 14.6% of control patients. The number of hcs used per patient-year were significantly higher for the bc patients than for the control patients (14.97 vs. 6.13, p < 0.01), resulting in higher costs per patient-year ($1,210 vs. $325; $885 attributable cost to bc, p < 0.01). The number of hcs utilized and the associated costs increased as the bc stage increased. In contrast, hcs costs decreased as income increased and as previous health care exposure decreased.

Interpretation: Patients with bc used twice as many hcs, resulting in costs that were almost 4 times those observed in a matched control group. Less than an additional $1000 per bc patient per year were spent on hcs utilization in the study population.

Keywords: Breast cancer; costs; disease stage; home care; population-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clarke A. Benefits and drawbacks of hospital-at-home schemes. Prof Nurse. 1997;12:734–6. - PubMed
    1. Grayson ML. Hospital-in-the-home care: is it worth the hassle? Med J Aust. 1998;168:262–3. - PubMed
    1. Welch HG, Wennberg DE, Welch WP. The use of Medicare home health care services. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:324–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608013350506. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laporte A, Croxford R, Coyte PC. Can a publicly funded home care system successfully allocate service based on perceived need rather than socioeconomic status? A Canadian experience. Health Soc Care Community. 2007;15:108–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00672.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hollander MJ, Chappell NL. A comparative analysis of costs to government for home care and long-term residential care services, standardized for client care needs. Can J Aging. 2007;26(suppl 1):149–61. doi: 10.3138/cja.26.suppl_1.149. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources