Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013;8(1):e53127.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053127. Epub 2013 Jan 2.

Psychomotor function in chronic daily Cannabis smokers during sustained abstinence

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Psychomotor function in chronic daily Cannabis smokers during sustained abstinence

Wendy M Bosker et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Background: The present study assessed psychomotor function in chronic, daily cannabis smokers during 3 weeks continuously monitored abstinence on a secure research unit. We hypothesized that psychomotor performance would improve during abstinence of chronic, daily cannabis smokers.

Methodology/principal findings: Performance on the critical tracking (CTT) and divided attention (DAT) tasks was assessed in 19 male chronic, daily cannabis smokers at baseline and after 8, 14-16 and 21-23 days of continuously monitored abstinence. Psychomotor performance was compared to a control group of non-intoxicated occasional drug users. Critical frequency (λ(c)) of the CTT and tracking error and control losses of the DAT were the primary outcome measures. Results showed that chronic cannabis smokers' performance on the CTT (p<0.001) and the DAT (p<0.001) was impaired during baseline relative to the comparison group. Psychomotor performance in the chronic cannabis smokers improved over 3 weeks of abstinence, but did not recover to equivalent control group performance.

Conclusions/significance: Sustained cannabis abstinence moderately improved critical tracking and divided attention performance in chronic, daily cannabis smokers, but impairment was still observable compared to controls after 3 weeks of abstinence. Between group differences, however, need to be interpreted with caution as chronic smokers and controls were not matched for education, social economic status, life style and race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean (SE) λc in the critical tracking task as a function of time of abstinence in chronic daily cannabis smokers. ‡ indicates significant difference (p<0.05) from baseline; * indicates significant difference (p<0.05) from control group.
N = 19 at baseline, N = 18 on day 8, N = 19 on days 14–16, N = 12 on days 21–23 and N = 30 for controls.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean (SE) number of control losses in the divided attention task as a function of time of abstinence in chronic daily cannabis smokers.
‡ indicates significant difference (p<0.05) from baseline; * indicates significant difference (p<0.05) from control group. N = 19 at baseline, N = 18 on day 8, N = 19 on days 14–16, N = 12 on days 21–23 and N = 30 for controls.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mean (SE) tracking error on the divided attention task as a function of time of abstinence in chronic daily cannabis smokers.
‡ indicates significant difference (p<0.05) from baseline; * indicates significant difference (p<0.05) from control group. N = 19 at baseline, N = 18 on day 8, N = 19 on days 14–16, N = 12 on days 21–23 and N = 30 for controls.

References

    1. UNODC (2010) World drug report 2010. New York: United Nations Publications, Sales No. E.10.XI.13.
    1. SAMHSA (2010) Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume I. Summary of National Findings: Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-36, HHS Publication No. SMA 09–4434). Rockville, MD.
    1. EMCDDA (2010) Annual report 2010: the state of the drugs problem in Europe: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    1. Solowij N, Battisti R (2008) The chronic effects of cannabis on memory in humans: a review. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 1: 81–98. - PubMed
    1. Solowij N, Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Babor T, Kadden R, et al. (2002) Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment. JAMA 287: 1123–1131. - PubMed

Publication types