Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 9:13:7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7.

Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews

Jean-François Gehanno  1 , Laetitia Rollin, Stefan Darmoni
Affiliations

Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews

Jean-François Gehanno et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: In searches for clinical trials and systematic reviews, it is said that Google Scholar (GS) should never be used in isolation, but in addition to PubMed, Cochrane, and other trusted sources of information. We therefore performed a study to assess the coverage of GS specifically for the studies included in systematic reviews and evaluate if GS was sensitive enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.

Methods: All the original studies included in 29 systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database Syst Rev or in the JAMA in 2009 were gathered in a gold standard database. GS was searched for all these studies one by one to assess the percentage of studies which could have been identified by searching only GS.

Results: All the 738 original studies included in the gold standard database were retrieved in GS (100%).

Conclusion: The coverage of GS for the studies included in the systematic reviews is 100%. If the authors of the 29 systematic reviews had used only GS, no reference would have been missed. With some improvement in the research options, to increase its precision, GS could become the leading bibliographic database in medicine and could be used alone for systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Giustini D. How Google is changing medicine. BMJ. 2005;331:1487–1488. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1487. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindberg DA. Searching the medical literature. NEJM. 2006;354:2393. - PubMed
    1. Wang Y, Howard P. Google Scholar Usage: An Academic Library's Experience. J Web Librarianship. 2012;6(2):94–108. doi: 10.1080/19322909.2012.672067. - DOI
    1. Freeman MK, Lauderdale SA, Kendrach MG, Woolley TW. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:478–484. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L223. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shultz M. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007;95:442–445. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources