Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;10(4):562-83.
doi: 10.2203/dose-response.11-056.Doss. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

Shifting the paradigm in radiation safety

Affiliations

Shifting the paradigm in radiation safety

Mohan Doss. Dose Response. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

The current radiation safety paradigm using the linear no-threshold (LNT) model is based on the premise that even the smallest amount of radiation may cause mutations increasing the risk of cancer. Autopsy studies have shown that the presence of cancer cells is not a decisive factor in the occurrence of clinical cancer. On the other hand, suppression of immune system more than doubles the cancer risk in organ transplant patients, indicating its key role in keeping occult cancers in check. Low dose radiation (LDR) elevates immune response, and so it may reduce rather than increase the risk of cancer. LNT model pays exclusive attention to DNA damage, which is not a decisive factor, and completely ignores immune system response, which is an important factor, and so is not scientifically justifiable. By not recognizing the importance of the immune system in cancer, and not exploring exercise intervention, the current paradigm may have missed an opportunity to reduce cancer deaths among atomic bomb survivors. Increased antioxidants from LDR may reduce aging-related non-cancer diseases since oxidative damage is implicated in these. A paradigm shift is warranted to reduce further casualties, reduce fear of LDR, and enable investigation of potential beneficial applications of LDR.

Keywords: Aging-related diseases; Antioxidant stimulation; Immune system; LNT model; Low dose radiation; Radiation safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1A
FIGURE 1A
Percentage of patients from a geriatric hospital in Japan who had cancer as determined by autopsy during 1982–1994, as a function of age. Data from (Imaida et al., 1997).
FIGURE 1B
FIGURE 1B
Cancer mortality rate per 100,000 in Japan as a function of age (WHO, 2011).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage change in SEER age-adjusted cancer incidence rates in 1 year.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alberts DS, Hess LM, Thomson CA, Chen Z. The Role of Diet, Physical Activity and Body Composition in Cancer Prevention - Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Springer; Berlin Heidelberg: 2008.
    1. Allison AC. Tumour development following immunosuppression. Proc R Soc Med. 1970;63:1077–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison W. Risk perception and energy infrastructure, Written evidence submitted to UK Parliament [Online] 2011. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/writ... [Accessed Jan 8 2012].
    1. Altekruse S, Kosary C, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Ruhl J, Howlader N, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner M, Lewis D, Cronin K, Chen H, Feuer E, Stinchcomb D, Edwards BK, editors. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: 2010. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2010. [Online] Available: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/ [Accessed Apr 23 2010].
    1. Anderson RE, Lefkovits I. In vitro evaluation of radiation-induced augmentation of the immune response. Am J Pathol. 1979;97:456–72. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources