Shifting the paradigm in radiation safety
- PMID: 23304105
- PMCID: PMC3526328
- DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.11-056.Doss
Shifting the paradigm in radiation safety
Abstract
The current radiation safety paradigm using the linear no-threshold (LNT) model is based on the premise that even the smallest amount of radiation may cause mutations increasing the risk of cancer. Autopsy studies have shown that the presence of cancer cells is not a decisive factor in the occurrence of clinical cancer. On the other hand, suppression of immune system more than doubles the cancer risk in organ transplant patients, indicating its key role in keeping occult cancers in check. Low dose radiation (LDR) elevates immune response, and so it may reduce rather than increase the risk of cancer. LNT model pays exclusive attention to DNA damage, which is not a decisive factor, and completely ignores immune system response, which is an important factor, and so is not scientifically justifiable. By not recognizing the importance of the immune system in cancer, and not exploring exercise intervention, the current paradigm may have missed an opportunity to reduce cancer deaths among atomic bomb survivors. Increased antioxidants from LDR may reduce aging-related non-cancer diseases since oxidative damage is implicated in these. A paradigm shift is warranted to reduce further casualties, reduce fear of LDR, and enable investigation of potential beneficial applications of LDR.
Keywords: Aging-related diseases; Antioxidant stimulation; Immune system; LNT model; Low dose radiation; Radiation safety.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies.Chem Biol Interact. 2019 Mar 1;301:54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.013. Epub 2019 Feb 11. Chem Biol Interact. 2019. PMID: 30763548 Review.
-
Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?J Nucl Med. 2018 Dec;59(12):1786-1793. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217182. Epub 2018 Sep 27. J Nucl Med. 2018. PMID: 30262515 Review.
-
Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model.Genes Environ. 2020 Jan 1;42:1. doi: 10.1186/s41021-019-0141-8. eCollection 2020. Genes Environ. 2020. PMID: 31908690 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.C R Acad Sci III. 1999 Feb-Mar;322(2-3):197-204. doi: 10.1016/s0764-4469(99)80044-4. C R Acad Sci III. 1999. PMID: 10196673 Review.
-
Atomic bomb health benefits.Dose Response. 2008;6(4):369-82. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.08-009.Luckey. Epub 2008 Aug 11. Dose Response. 2008. PMID: 19088902 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Correcting systemic deficiencies in our scientific infrastructure.Dose Response. 2013 Dec 6;12(2):185-201. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.13-046.Doss. eCollection 2014 May. Dose Response. 2013. PMID: 24910580 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence supporting radiation hormesis in atomic bomb survivor cancer mortality data.Dose Response. 2012 Dec;10(4):584-92. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.12-023.Doss. Epub 2012 Jul 13. Dose Response. 2012. PMID: 23304106 Free PMC article.
-
Low-dose ionizing radiation as a hormetin: experimental observations and therapeutic perspective for age-related disorders.Biogerontology. 2021 Apr;22(2):145-164. doi: 10.1007/s10522-020-09908-5. Epub 2021 Jan 9. Biogerontology. 2021. PMID: 33420860 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Point/Counterpoint: low-dose radiation is beneficial, not harmful.Med Phys. 2014 Jul;41(7):070601. doi: 10.1118/1.4881095. Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 24989368 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Computed tomography and patient risk: Facts, perceptions and uncertainties.World J Radiol. 2016 Dec 28;8(12):902-915. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902. World J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 28070242 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Alberts DS, Hess LM, Thomson CA, Chen Z. The Role of Diet, Physical Activity and Body Composition in Cancer Prevention - Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Springer; Berlin Heidelberg: 2008.
-
- Allison W. Risk perception and energy infrastructure, Written evidence submitted to UK Parliament [Online] 2011. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/writ... [Accessed Jan 8 2012].
-
- Altekruse S, Kosary C, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Ruhl J, Howlader N, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner M, Lewis D, Cronin K, Chen H, Feuer E, Stinchcomb D, Edwards BK, editors. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: 2010. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2010. [Online] Available: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/ [Accessed Apr 23 2010].
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources