Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;1(1):41-55.
doi: 10.5243/jsswr.2010.4.

A Spatial Analysis of Risks and Resources for Reentry Youth in Los Angeles County

Affiliations

A Spatial Analysis of Risks and Resources for Reentry Youth in Los Angeles County

Laura S Abrams et al. J Soc Social Work Res. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Research on youth reentering the community following incarceration has largely focused on individual risks for negative outcomes and in doing so, has overlooked the potential importance of the neighborhood context(s) where youth return. Addressing this research gap, this study explores associations between neighborhood risks and resources and rates of youth reentering the community following incarceration. Examining archival data from 272 zip codes in Los Angeles County, spatial analysis detected positive associations between rates of youth reentry and unemployment, poverty, and ethnic minority concentration. Reentry rates were also positively associated with neighborhood risks including density of off-premise alcohol outlets and level of community violence. Examining resources on their own, specifically designated youth services were positively associated with reentry rates, whereas education and mental health/substance abuse services were negatively associated. However, none of these resources were significantly associated with reentry rates when neighborhood risks were simultaneously considered. The results of this study highlight the relevance of neighborhood context in youth reentry research and lead to several directions for future study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams LS. From corrections to community: Youth offenders’ perceptions of the challenges of transition. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2007;442/3:31–53. doi: 10.1300/J076v44n02_02. - DOI
    1. Abrams LS. Listening to juvenile offenders: Can residential treatment prevent recidivism? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2006;23(1):61–85. doi: 10.1007/s10560-005-0029-2. - DOI
    1. Abrams LS, Shannon SK, Sangalang C. Transition services for incarcerated youth: A mixed methods evaluation study. Children and Youth Services Review. 2008;30:522–535. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.11.003. - DOI
    1. Alaniz ML, Cartmill RS, Parker RN. Immigrants & violence: The importance of neighborhood context. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 1998;20:155–174. doi: 10.1177/07399863980202002. - DOI
    1. Anthony EK, Samples MD, de Kervor DN, Ituarte S, Lee C, Austin MJ. Coming back home: The reintegration of formerly incarcerated youth with service implications. Children and Youth Services Review. 2010;2010 doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.018. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources