Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 10:13:15.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-15.

Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series

Affiliations

Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series

Anna Crispo et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancers and assess whether differences in tumour biology might translate into survival benefit.

Methods: In a clinical series of 448 women with operable breast cancer, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate the likelihood of cancer recurrence and death. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate analyses including mode of detection, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and lymph node status. These same models were applied to subgroups defined by molecular subtypes.

Results: Screen detected breast cancers tended to show more favourable clinicopathological features and survival outcomes compared to symptomatic cancers. The luminal A subtype was more common in women with mammography detected tumours than in symptomatic patients (68.5 vs. 59.0%, p=0.04). Data analysis across categories of molecular subtypes revealed significantly longer disease free and overall survival for screen detected cancers with a luminal A subtype only (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). For women with a luminal A subtype, the independent prognostic role of mode of detection on recurrence was confirmed in Cox proportional hazard models (p=0.03). An independent role of modality of detection on survival was also suggested (p=0.05).

Conclusions: Molecular subtypes did not substantially explain the differences in survival outcomes between screened and symptomatic patients. However, our results suggest that molecular profiles might play a role in interpreting such differences at least partially.Further studies are warranted to reinterpret the efficacy of screening programmes in the light of tumour biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of method of detection on disease-free and overall survival according to the molecular subtypes. A disease-free and B overall survival for luminal A subtype. C disease-free and D overall survival for luminal B subtype. E disease-free and F overall survival for HER2+ subtype.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006. - PubMed
    1. Vainio H, Bianchini F, editor. Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention; Vol 7.
    1. Ministry of Health. Recommendations for oncologic screenings: prevention of breast cancer, cervical cancer and colorectal cancer. 2006.
    1. Smith R. International programmes for the detection of breast cancer. Salud Publica Mex. 2011;53(5):394–404. - PubMed
    1. Pálka I, Kelemen G, Ormándi K, Lázár G, Nyári T, Thurzó L. et al.Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers. Pathol Oncol Res. 2008;14:161–167. doi: 10.1007/s12253-008-9010-7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types