Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May-Jun;31(3):382-8.
Epub 2013 Jan 10.

The role of lupus anticoagulant and triple marker positivity as risk factors for rethrombosis in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Affiliations
  • PMID: 23305633

The role of lupus anticoagulant and triple marker positivity as risk factors for rethrombosis in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Gabriela Hernández-Molina et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To ascertain rethrombotic risk factors in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 95 patients according to their rethrombotic status. We registered anticoagulation (OA) status, comorbidities, traditional thrombotic factors, prevalence of aCL (IgG-IgM), anti-β2GP-I (IgG-IgM), LA and triple marker positivity (LA, aCL and anti-β2GP-I).

Results: Forty-two patients had rethrombosis and 53 were rethrombosis-free. The median follow-up was 4.5 (0.3-26) years. There were no differences in comorbidities and traditional thrombotic factors. Patients with rethrombosis had more frequently LA (62% vs. 40%, p=0.04), were younger (41 vs. 47 years, p=0.01) and received less frequently OA (23% vs. 54%, p=0.002). A logistic regression analysis showed that the OA status (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.57, p=0.004) and age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98, p=0.01) remained significant. Patients who discontinued OA and developed rethrombosis (Group 1, n=32) vs. patients who discontinued OA, but remained rethrombosis-free (Group 2, n=24) were also analysed. We found a higher prevalence of LA and triple marker positivity in Group 1 (67% vs. 31%; OR= 4.5, 95% CI 1.3-14.9, p= 0.01 and 57% vs. 27%; OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.7-12; p=0.03), respectively. Both variables remained associated with rethrombosis when compared with the overall rethrombosis group vs. Group 2 (LA 62% vs. 31%, OR= 3.6 95% CI 1.1-11.2, p=0.03; triple marker 54% vs. 27%; OR 32 95% CI 1.01-10.2, p=0.05).

Conclusions: LA positivity and triple aPL positivity confer a more severe risk of rethrombosis in PAPS patients, irrespective of their anticoagulation status and known conventional risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources