Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May;39(5):847-56.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study

Thomas Bein  1 , Steffen Weber-Carstens, Anton Goldmann, Thomas Müller, Thomas Staudinger, Jörg Brederlau, Ralf Muellenbach, Rolf Dembinski, Bernhard M Graf, Marlene Wewalka, Alois Philipp, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Matthias Lubnow, Arthur S Slutsky
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study

Thomas Bein et al. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May.

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by damage to the lung caused by various insults, including ventilation itself, and tidal hyperinflation can lead to ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). We investigated the effects of a low tidal volume (V(T)) strategy (V(T) ≈ 3 ml/kg/predicted body weight [PBW]) using pumpless extracorporeal lung assist in established ARDS.

Methods: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled after a 'stabilization period' (24 h with optimized therapy and high PEEP). They were randomly assigned to receive a low V(T) ventilation (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 elimination, or to a ARDSNet strategy (≈6 ml/kg) without the extracorporeal device. The primary outcome was the 28-days and 60-days ventilator-free days (VFD). Secondary outcome parameters were respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, analgesic/sedation use, complications and hospital mortality.

Results: Ventilation with very low V(T)'s was easy to implement with extracorporeal CO2-removal. VFD's within 60 days were not different between the study group (33.2 ± 20) and the control group (29.2 ± 21, p = 0.469), but in more hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FIO2 ≤150) a post hoc analysis demonstrated significant improved VFD-60 in study patients (40.9 ± 12.8) compared to control (28.2 ± 16.4, p = 0.033). The mortality rate was low (16.5%) and did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: The use of very low V(T) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal has the potential to further reduce VILI compared with a 'normal' lung protective management. Whether this strategy will improve survival in ARDS patients remains to be determined (Clinical trials NCT 00538928).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00538928.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening, randomization and follow-up according to study protocol. V T tidal volume, CVP central venous pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, vvECMO veno-venous ECMO
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Post-hoc analysis: probability of successful weaning in patients presenting with PaO2/FIO2 ≤150 versus >150 (only surviving patients)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean tidal volumes (ml per kg predicted body weight), minute ventilation and difference of plateau pressure and PEEP (P plat − PEEP), in the treatment and control groups during the study period
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percent of spontaneous ventilation on minute ventilation and oxygenation (PaO2/FIO2) in the treatment and control groups during the study period
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1334–1337. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421806. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, Corno E, Menaldo E, Davini O, Gandini G, Herrmann P, Mascia L, Quintel M, Slutsky AS, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM. Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:160–166. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200607-915OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grasso S, Stripoli T, Sacchi M, Sacchi M, Trerotoli P, Staffieri F, Franchini D, De Monte V, Valentini V, Pugliese P, Crovace A, Driessen B, Fiore T. Inhomogeneity of lung parenchyma during the open lung strategy: a computed tomography scan study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:415–423. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200901-0156OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Ventilation with lower tidal volume as compared with traditional tidal volume for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–1308. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hager DN, Krishnan JA, Hayden DL, Hayden DL, Brower RG, ARDS Clinical Trials Network Tidal volume reduction in patients with acute lung injury when plateau pressures are not high. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:1241–1245. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200501-048CP. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data