The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 23307148
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325992
The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Background and study aims: It is uncertain if needle gauge impacts the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic mass lesions. Our aim was to use meta-analysis to more robustly define the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses using 22 G and 25 G needles.
Patients and methods: Studies were identified by searching nine medical databases for reports published between 1994 and 2011, using a reproducible search strategy comprised of relevant terms. Only studies comparing the overall diagnostic accuracy of 22 G vs. 25 G EUS needles that used surgical histology or at least 6 months clinical follow up for a gold standard were included. Two reviewers independently scored the identified studies for methodology and abstracted pertinent data. When required, the original investigators were contacted to provide additional data. Pooling was conducted by both fixed-effects and random-effects models. Diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results: Eight studies involving 1292 subjects met the defined inclusion criteria. Of the 1292 patients, 799 were in the 22 G group and 565 were in the 25 G group (both needles were used in 72 patients). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the 22 G needle were 0.85 (95%CI 0.82-0.88) and 1 (95%CI 0.98-1) respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the 25 G needle were 0.93 (95%CI 0.91-0.96) and 0.97 (95%CI 0.93-0.99) respectively. The bivariate generalized linear random-effect model indicated that the 25 G needle is associated with a higher sensitivity (P = 0.0003) but comparable specificity (P = 0.97) to the 22 G needle.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests 25 G needle systems are more sensitive than 22 G needles for diagnosing pancreatic malignancy.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26419845 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):445-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214643. Epub 2009 May 5. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19418399
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration in pancreatic cystic lesions.Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Jan;46(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jul 31. Dig Liver Dis. 2014. PMID: 23916241
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Using 22-gauge and 25-gauge Needles for Pancreatic Masses.Med Sci Monit. 2018 Nov 19;24:8333-8341. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911405. Med Sci Monit. 2018. PMID: 30452433 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):893-903.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. PMID: 31310744
Cited by
-
A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.Endosc Int Open. 2016 May;4(5):E497-505. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106958. Endosc Int Open. 2016. PMID: 27227104 Free PMC article.
-
Finding a needle in a haystack: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic masses in the setting of chronic pancreatitis.Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Aug;33(4):418-425. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0484. Epub 2020 May 10. Ann Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32624664 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Study for Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 25- and 22-Gauge Core Biopsy Needles in Solid Pancreatic Masses.PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0154401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154401. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27149404 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing the diagnostic adequacy of 25-Gauge fork-tip versus franseen versus reverse-bevel-type needles in EUS-guided tissue acquisition: A prospective randomized study with a retrospective control.Endosc Ultrasound. 2024 Jan-Feb;13(1):22-27. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000025. Epub 2023 Oct 18. Endosc Ultrasound. 2024. PMID: 38947121 Free PMC article.
-
How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jul;6(13):266. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.36. Ann Transl Med. 2018. PMID: 30094252 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous