Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jul;14(3):409-21.
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs057. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

A logrank test-based method for sizing clinical trials with two co-primary time-to-event endpoints

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A logrank test-based method for sizing clinical trials with two co-primary time-to-event endpoints

Tomoyuki Sugimoto et al. Biostatistics. 2013 Jul.

Erratum in

Abstract

We discuss sample size determination for clinical trials evaluating the joint effects of an intervention on two potentially correlated co-primary time-to-event endpoints. For illustration, we consider the most common case, a comparison of two randomized groups, and use typical copula families to model the bivariate endpoints. A correlation structure of the bivariate logrank statistic is specified to account for the correlation among the endpoints, although the between-group comparison is performed using the univariate logrank statistic. We propose methods to calculate the required sample size to compare the two groups and evaluate the performance of the methods and the behavior of required sample sizes via simulation.

Keywords: Bivariate dependence; Censored data; Copula model; Logrank statistic; Power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Contour plots of the required total sample size with the hazard ratios of time-to-events of virologic and regimen failures, and correlation for the three copulas. The sample size was calculated to detect the joint reduction for both time-to-event outcomes with the overall power of 0.90 at the one-sided significance level of 0.0125, where ρ=ρ(1)=ρ(2)=0.0, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.8; formula image, and formula image; τa=0, and τf=96; a(1)=0.5.

References

    1. Freedman L. S. Table of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank test. Statistics in Medicine. 1982;1:121–129. - PubMed
    1. Hamasaki T., Sugimoto T., Evans S., Sozu T. Sample size determination for clinical trials with co-primary endpoints: exponential event times. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2012 (Article first published online: 19 October 2012 as 10.1002/pst.1545)) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsieh F. Y. Comparing sample size formulae for trials with unbalanced allocation using the logrank test. Statistics in Medicine. 1992;11:1091–1098. - PubMed
    1. Hsu L., Prentice R. L. On assessing the strength of dependency between failure time variables. Biometrika. 1996;83:491–506.
    1. Hung H. M. J., Wang S. J. Some controversial multiple testing problems in regulatory applications. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 2009;19:1–11. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances