Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of 'opt in' versus 'opt out' approaches
- PMID: 23311340
- PMCID: PMC3566917
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-3
Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of 'opt in' versus 'opt out' approaches
Abstract
Background: Although in health services survey research we strive for a high response rate, this must be balanced against the need to recruit participants ethically and considerately, particularly in surveys with a sensitive nature. In survey research there are no established recommendations to guide recruitment approach and an 'opt-in' system that requires potential participants to request a copy of the questionnaire by returning a reply slip is frequently adopted. However, in observational research the risk to participants is lower than in clinical research and so some surveys have used an 'opt-out' system. The effect of this approach on response and distress is unknown. We sought to investigate this in a survey of end of life care completed by bereaved relatives.
Methods: Out of a sample of 1422 bereaved relatives we assigned potential participants to one of two study groups: an 'opt in' group (n=711) where a letter of invitation was issued with a reply slip to request a copy of the questionnaire; or an 'opt out' group (n=711) where the survey questionnaire was provided alongside the invitation letter. We assessed response and distress between groups.
Results: From a sample of 1422, 473 participants returned questionnaires. Response was higher in the 'opt out' group than in the 'opt in' group (40% compared to 26.4%: χ(2) =29.79, p-value<.01), there were no differences in distress or complaints about the survey between groups, and assignment to the 'opt out' group was an independent predictor of response (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.45-2.34). Moreover, the 'opt in' group were more likely to decline to participate (χ(2)=28.60, p-value<.01) and there was a difference in the pattern of questionnaire responses between study groups.
Conclusion: Given that the 'opt out' method of recruitment is associated with a higher response than the 'opt in' method, seems to have no impact on complaints or distress about the survey, and there are differences in the patterns of responses between groups, the 'opt out' method could be recommended as the most efficient way to recruit into surveys, even in those with a sensitive nature.
Similar articles
-
Informing National Health Service patients about participation in clinical research: A comparison of opt-in and opt-out approaches across the United Kingdom.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;55(4):400-408. doi: 10.1177/0004867420973261. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33225713 Free PMC article.
-
Randomised prospective single-blinded study comparing 'inside-out' versus 'outside-in' transobturator tapes in the management of urodynamic stress incontinence: 1-year outcomes from the E-TOT study.BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):870-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02544.x. Epub 2010 Apr 12. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20394610 Clinical Trial.
-
Using police crash databases for injury prevention research - a comparison of opt-out and opt-in approaches to study recruitment.Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Jun;38(3):286-9. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12237. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24890488
-
Patients' perspectives on opt-out consent for observational research: systematic review and focus group.Br J Nurs. 2018 Dec 13;27(22):1321-1329. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.22.1321. Br J Nurs. 2018. PMID: 30525978
-
A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education.Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):592-604. doi: 10.1111/medu.13519. Epub 2018 Feb 8. Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29417600 Review.
Cited by
-
The pace of hospital life: A mixed methods study.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0255775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255775. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34407092 Free PMC article.
-
Participation in a randomised controlled feasibility study of a complex intervention for the management of the Respiratory Symptom Distress Cluster in lung cancer: patient, carer and research staff views.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6):e12538. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12538. Epub 2016 Jul 8. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017. PMID: 27389436 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Aug;11(4):486-497. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0607-2. Epub 2017 Apr 3. J Cancer Surviv. 2017. PMID: 28374090
-
Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care.PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0184750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184750. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28977013 Free PMC article.
-
Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS.BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Oct;26(1):e300774. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300774. BMJ Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 37879674 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cartwright A. Health surveys in practice and in potential. London: King’s Fund Publishing Office; 1983.
-
- Steeh CG. Trends in nonresponse rates, 1952–1979. Pub Opinion Quart. 1981;45:40–57. doi: 10.1086/268633. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical