Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jan 11:13:20.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-20.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of rapid-acting intramuscular olanzapine in Japanese patients for schizophrenia with acute agitation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of rapid-acting intramuscular olanzapine in Japanese patients for schizophrenia with acute agitation

Hideaki Katagiri et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Olanzapine rapid-acting intramuscular (IM) injection is an atypical antipsychotic drug already used overseas and recently approved in Japan. The objective of this study was to confirm the efficacy of rapid-acting IM olanzapine 10 mg was greater than IM placebo in patients with exacerbation of schizophrenia with acute psychotic agitation by comparing changes from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection, as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) total score.

Methods: We conducted a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in Japanese patients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the diagnostic criteria specified in the DSM-IV-TR. Patients were randomized to 2 treatment groups: IM olanzapine (10 mg) or IM placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in PANSS-EC from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection. Treatment groups were compared with an analysis of variance model which included treatment and site as factors. During the 24-hour treatment period, safety was assessed by clinical examination and laboratory investigations, electrocardiograms, extrapyramidal symptoms scales, and recording spontaneously reported adverse events.

Results: Of the 91 randomized patients, 90 patients (45 IM olanzapine-group; 45 IM placebo-group) were in the full analysis set. The mean change of PANSS-EC total score from baseline to 2 hours after the first IM injection (mean±standard deviation) was -9.2±4.5 for the IM olanzapine group and -2.8±5.6 for the IM placebo group. The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (p<.001). There were no deaths, serious adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation, severe TEAEs, or instances of oversedation in this study. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in the proportion of patients with potentially clinically significant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate), electrocardiograms, and treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms.

Conclusion: The efficacy of IM olanzapine 10 mg in patients with exacerbation of schizophrenia with acute psychotic agitation was greater than IM placebo in the primary efficacy measure, PANSS-EC. Intramuscular olanzapine 10 mg was shown to be generally safe and tolerable, and could be a new option for treatment of schizophrenia in Japan.

Trial registration: NCT00970281.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time-course change from baseline in PANSS-EC total score up to 24 hours after administration.PANSS-EC total score for timepoint-wise change from baseline to 24 hours after the first IM injection, full analysis set, IM Olz, 10 mg (n=45), IM Placebo (n=44). Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; IM Olz=intramuscular olanzapine *statistically significant difference between groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krakowski M, Czobor P. Violence in psychiatric patients: the role of psychosis, frontal lobe impairment, and ward turmoil. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38:230–236. doi: 10.1016/S0010-440X(97)90031-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Noble P, Rodger S. Violence by psychiatric in-patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;155:384–390. - PubMed
    1. Binder RL, McNiel DE. Emergency psychiatry: contemporary practices in managing acutely violent patients in 20 psychiatric emergency rooms. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:1553–1554. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia. 2. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc; 2004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas P, Alptekin K, Gheorghe M, Mauri M, Olivares JM, Riedel M. Management of patients presenting with acute psychotic episodes of schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2009;23:193–212. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200923030-00002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data