Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;51(5):554-60.

Exposure of laboratory animal care workers to airborne mouse and rat allergens

Affiliations

Exposure of laboratory animal care workers to airborne mouse and rat allergens

Joshua T Glueck et al. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012.

Abstract

Urine of rats and mice is the main source of allergenic proteins that can enter the respiratory tract of laboratory animal care workers. Little is known about the levels and determinants of these exposures in the United States. We investigated the relationship between activities in animal facilities and levels of personal exposure to allergen by collecting personal breathing zone dust samples from 7 caretakers during full workdays for 1 wk. Mice and rat urinary allergens in inhalable dust were quantified via immunoassay. The activities of the sampled workers were observed, and the methods of preventing exposure to allergens were recorded. Mouse urinary allergen was detected in 20 of 39 measurements, yielding a geometric mean of 0.8 ng/m(3) with a maximum of 24 ng/m(3). Washing and cleaning cages and the number of mice handled daily were the most important determinants of personal exposure to mouse urinary allergen, as identified by using multiple linear regressions that explained 51% of total variance. Personal exposures to mouse urinary allergen were associated with day-to-day variation of tasks rather than characteristics of workers. Where potential for personal exposure is the highest, protective measures (N95 masks and cage dumping stations) appeared to be used, as is appropriate. Rat urinary allergen was detected in 4 of 39 measurements; detectable concentrations were between 0.8 and 39 ng/m(3). Only persons who handled rats were exposed to rat urinary allergen. The current findings are valuable for establishing exposure levels against which comparisons of improvement or deterioration of personal exposures can be made.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relationship of the number of animals handled to personal exposure to mouse urinary allergens (personal exposure axis is transformed by using log2).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relationship of personal exposure to mouse urinary allergens to the number of cages changed daily (personal exposure axis is transformed by using log2).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationship of the number of animals handled to personal exposure to rat urinary allergens (personal exposure axis is transformed by using log2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burstyn I. 2009. Measurement error and model specification in determining how duration of tasks affects level of occupational exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 53:265–270 - PubMed
    1. Burstyn I, Teschke K.1999. Studying the determinants of exposure: a review of methods. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 60:57–72 - PubMed
    1. Burstyn I, Teschke K, Bartlett K, Kennedy SM. 1997. Exposure levels and determinants of inhalable dust exposure in bakeries. Ann Occup Hyg 41:609–624 - PubMed
    1. Edwards RG, Beeson MF, Dewdney JM. 1983. Laboratory animal allergy: the measurement of airborne urinary allergens and the effects of different environmental conditions. Lab Anim 17:235–239 - PubMed
    1. Eggleston PA, Newill CA, Ansari AA, Pustelnik A, Lou SR, Evans R, 3rd, Marsh DG, Longbottom JL, Corn M. 1989. Task-related variation in airborne concentrations of laboratory animal allergens: studies with rat n I. J Allergy Clin Immunol 84:347–352 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms