Cost analysis of immediate postabortal IUD insertion compared to planned IUD insertion at the time of abortion follow up
- PMID: 23312934
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.11.011
Cost analysis of immediate postabortal IUD insertion compared to planned IUD insertion at the time of abortion follow up
Abstract
Background: Immediate postabortal intrauterine device (IUD) insertion decreases rates of repeat abortions. However, only one third of high-volume, non-hospital abortion providers in the United States offer immediate postabortal IUD placement.
Study design: We conducted a cost analysis from a public payer perspective to evaluate the potential cost savings associated with a policy of immediate postabortal IUD insertion, compared to planned IUD insertion at the time of abortion follow up. Sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulation were performed.
Results: Considering only direct costs of contraception and pregnancy-related care over 1 year, immediate postabortal IUD provision decreases public program expenditures by US$111 per woman compared to planned IUD placement at follow up. Over 5 years, the savings increases to $4296 per woman, when public health and social program costs are also considered.
Conclusion: Immediate postabortal IUD insertion is cost saving from a public payer perspective, compared to planned insertion at the time of follow up. These savings are seen over a wide range of model inputs.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion.Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 14. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 18672116 Clinical Trial.
-
Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1286-94. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000265336.14160.cc. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17540799
-
Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan;103(1):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.032. Epub 2014 Oct 25. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID: 25439838
-
Immediate postabortal insertion of the frameless IUD: review of current experience.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Mar;5(1):96-8. doi: 10.1080/13625180008500374. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000. PMID: 10836670 Review.
-
Immediate and delayed placement of the intrauterine device after abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 May 18;14(1):11385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62327-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38762680 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Antiseizure medications and oral contraceptives: Impact of enzyme inducers on pregnancy outcomes and costs.Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Dec;125:108368. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108368. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Epilepsy Behav. 2021. PMID: 34775242 Free PMC article.
-
Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):718-726. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000475. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25198262 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying the economic burden of unintended pregnancies due to drug-drug interactions with hormonal contraceptives from the United States payer perspective.Gates Open Res. 2021 Nov 18;5:171. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13430.1. eCollection 2021. Gates Open Res. 2021. PMID: 36523752 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a pharmacoeconomic registry: an example using hormonal contraceptives.Health Econ Rev. 2021 Mar 20;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00309-z. Health Econ Rev. 2021. PMID: 33745016 Free PMC article.
-
Expulsion and continuation rates after postabortion insertion of framed IUDs versus frameless IUDs - review of the literature.Open Access J Contracept. 2015 Jul 9;6:87-94. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S87607. eCollection 2015. Open Access J Contracept. 2015. PMID: 29386926 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources