Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;190(1):70-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.108. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

The impact of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores and American Urological Association symptom score on the sensitivity of cancer detection using the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator

Affiliations

The impact of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores and American Urological Association symptom score on the sensitivity of cancer detection using the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator

Donna P Ankerst et al. J Urol. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the independent predictive value of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores and AUASS (American Urological Association symptom score) compared to risk factors included in the PCPTRC (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator for prostate cancer) and PCPTHG (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator for high grade cancer [Gleason grade 7 or greater]).

Materials and methods: Of 5,519 PCPT (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial) participants used to construct the PCPTRC 4,958 with AUASS and prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less were included on logistic regression analysis. Risk algorithms were evaluated in 571 EDRN (Early Detection Research Network) participants using the ROC AUC.

Results: A total of 1,094 participants (22.1%) had prostate cancer, of whom 232 (21.2%) had high grade disease. For prostate cancer prediction higher prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, family history of prostate cancer and number of cores were associated with increased risk, while volume was associated with decreased risk. Excluding prostate volume and number of cores, a history of negative biopsy and increased AUASS were also associated with lower risk. For high grade cancer higher prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, black race and number of cores were associated with increased risk and volume, while AUASS was associated with decreased risk. The AUC of the PCPTRC adjusted for volume and number of cores was 72.7% (using EDRN data), 68.2% when adjusted for AUASS alone and 67.6% PCPTRC. For high grade disease the AUCs were 74.8%, 74.0% and 73.5% (PCPTHG), respectively.

Conclusions: Adjusted PCPT risk calculators for volume, number of cores and AUASS improve cancer detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial interest and/or other relationship with CPRIT and National Cancer Institute.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PCPTRC_CLIN overall prostate cancer risk curves incorporating volume and number of cores, based on original PCPTRC and assuming white race, age 65 years, no prostate cancer family history, no prior biopsy, normal DRE, prostate volume 30, 42 and 57 cc, and 6 vs 12-core biopsy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PCPTHG_CLIN high grade prostate cancer risk curves incorporating volume and number of cores vs original PCPTHG, assuming white race, age 65 years, no prostate cancer family history, no prior biopsy, normal DRE, prostate volume 30, 42 and 57 cc, and 6 vs 12-core biopsy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PCPTRC_AUA overall prostate cancer risk curves incorporating AUASS and assuming white race, age 65 years, no prostate cancer family history, no prior biopsy, normal DRE and AUASS 0, 10, 20 or 30.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PCPTHG_AUA high grade prostate cancer risk curves incorporating AUASS and assuming white race, age 65 years, no prostate cancer family history, no prior biopsy, normal DRE and AUASS 0, 10, 20 or 30.
Figure 5
Figure 5
ROC curves evaluated on EDRN data set for overall prostate cancer for PCPTRC, PCPTRC_AUA and PCPTRC_CLIN.
Figure 6
Figure 6
ROC curves evaluated on EDRN dataset for high grade prostate cancer for PCPTHG, PCPTHG_AUA and PCPTHG_CLIN.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level <or = 4. 0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239. - PubMed
    1. Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al. Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:529. - PubMed
    1. Eyre SJ, Ankerst DP, Wei JT, et al. Validation in a multiple urology practice cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator for predicting prostate cancer detection. J Urol. 2009;182:2653. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parekh DJ, Ankerst DP, Higgins BA, et al. External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population. Urology. 2006;68:1152. - PubMed
    1. Roobol MJ, Schroeder FH, Hugosson J, et al. Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group. World J Urol. 2012;30:181. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances