Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jan;73(1):183-90.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202760. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

Efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in patients with moderate/severe active systemic lupus erythematosus: results from EMBLEM, a phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in patients with moderate/severe active systemic lupus erythematosus: results from EMBLEM, a phase IIb, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

Daniel J Wallace et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To identify a suitable dosing regimen of the CD22-targeted monoclonal antibody epratuzumab in adults with moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: A phase IIb, multicentre, randomised controlled study (NCT00624351) was conducted with 227 patients (37-39 per arm) receiving either: placebo, epratuzumab 200 mg cumulative dose (cd) (100 mg every other week (EOW)), 800 mg cd (400 mg EOW), 2400 mg cd (600 mg weekly), 2400 mg cd (1200 mg EOW), or 3600 mg cd (1800 mg EOW). The primary endpoint (not powered for significance) was the week 12 responder rate measured using a novel composite endpoint, the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA).

Results: Proportion of responders was higher in all epratuzumab groups than with placebo (overall treatment effect test p=0.148). Exploratory pairwise analysis demonstrated clinical improvement in patients receiving a cd of 2400 mg epratuzumab (OR for 600 mg weekly vs placebo: 3.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.8), nominal p=0.03; OR for 1200 mg EOW vs placebo: 2.6 (0.9 to 7.1), nominal p=0.07). Post-hoc comparison of all 2400 mg cd patients versus placebo found an overall treatment effect (OR=2.9 (1.2 to 7.1), nominal p=0.02). Incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and infusion reactions was similar between epratuzumab and placebo groups, without decreases in immunoglobulin levels and only partial reduction in B-cell levels.

Conclusions: Treatment with epratuzumab 2400 mg cd was well tolerated in patients with moderately to severely active SLE, and associated with improvements in disease activity. Phase III studies are ongoing.

Keywords: B cells; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition (intention-to-treat population) through EMBLEM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
BILAG-based Combined Lupus Assessment response rate (A) at week 12 (intention-to-treat analysis) for all patient groups (B) over weeks 1–12 for the 2400 mg combined dose arms compared with the placebo group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients meeting criteria for BILAG improvement and enhanced BILAG improvement at week 12.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes from baseline in B-cell and CD22 levels. (A) Changes in absolute B-cell counts (cells/µl) (B) Changes in mean fluorescent intensity of CD22+ memory B cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. D'Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 2007;369:587–96 - PubMed
    1. Tsokos GC. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2011;365: 2110–21 - PubMed
    1. Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcon GS, Scofield L, et al. Understanding the epidemiology and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010;39:257–68 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg R. Why can't we find a new treatment for SLE? J Autoimmun 2009;32:223–30 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haubitz M. New and emerging treatment approaches to lupus. Biologics 2010;4:263–71 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data