Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr;189(1):15-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR

Manohar L Choudhary et al. J Virol Methods. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of viral respiratory infections is crucial for patient management. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR) is used increasingly to diagnose respiratory infections and has shown to be more sensitive than viral culture and antigen detection. Objective of the present study was to develop a one-step mRT-PCR that could detect 18 respiratory viruses in three sets. The method was compared with real time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for its sensitivity and specificity. Clinical specimens from 843 pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms were used in the study. 503 (59.7%) samples were detected positive by mRT-PCR. Of these 462 (54.8%) exhibited presence of a single pathogen and 41 (4.9%) had multiple pathogens. rRT-PCR detected 439 (52.1%) positive samples, where 419 (49.7%) exhibited one virus and 20 (2.4%) showed co-infections. Concordance between mRT-PCR and rRT-PCR was 91.9% and kappa correlation 0.837. Sensitivity and specificity of mRT-PCR were 99.5% and 83.7% while that of rRT-PCR was 86.9% and 99.4% respectively. Rhinovirus (17.2%) was the most frequently detected virus followed by respiratory syncytial virus B (15.4%), H1N1pdm09 (8.54%), parainfluenza virus-3 (5.8%) and metapneumovirus (5.2%). In conclusion, mRT-PCR is a rapid, cost effective, specific and highly sensitive method for detection of respiratory viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Auburn H., Zuckerman M., Broughton S., Greenough A., Smith M. Detection of nine respiratory RNA viruses using three multiplex RT PCR assays incorporating a novel RNA internal control transcript. J. Virol. Methods. 2011;176:9–13. - PubMed
    1. Bellau-Pujol S., Vabret A., Legrand L., Dina J., Gouarin S., Petitjean-Lecherbonnier J. Development of three multiplex RT PCR assays for the detection of 12 respiratory RNA viruses. J. Virol. Methods. 2005;12:53–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bharaj P., Sullender W.M., Kabra S.K., Mani K., Cherian J., Tyagi V., Chahar H.S., Kaushik S., Dar L., Broor S. Respiratory viral infections detected by multiplex PCR among pediatric patients with lower respiratory tract infections seen at an urban hospital in Delhi from 2005 to 2007. Virol. J. 2009;6:89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boonsuk P., Payungporn S., Chieochansin T., Samransamruajkit R., Amonsin A., Songserm T., Chaisingh A., Chamnanpood P., Chutinimitkul S., Theamboonlers A., Poovorawan Y. Detection of influenza virus types A and B and type A subtypes (H1, H3, and H5) by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2008;215:247–255. - PubMed
    1. Brittain-Long R., Westin J., Olofsson S., Lindh M., Andersson L.M. Prospective evaluation of a novel multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of fifteen respiratory pathogens-duration of symptoms significantly affects detection rate. J. Clin. Virol. 2010;47:263–267. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms