Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;16(4):537-42.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0228-4. Epub 2013 Jan 13.

Characteristics of intramural metastasis in gastric cancer

Affiliations

Characteristics of intramural metastasis in gastric cancer

Tatsuya Hashimoto et al. Gastric Cancer. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Intramural metastasis (IM) in gastric cancer is rare. However, it often occurs with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and has been reported to have a poor prognosis.

Methods: In 4,714 cases of gastric cancer that underwent gastrectomy, the clinicopathological features and postoperative prognoses of 29 cases with IM were evaluated and compared with 2,770 cases of advanced gastric cancer without IM.

Results: Of the 4,714 cases, 29 (0.6 %) were histopathologically diagnosed with gastric cancer with IM. There were significant differences in the number of lymph node metastases, capillary invasion, and stage grouping between cases with IM and advanced gastric cancer without IM. Metastasis size was approximately within 2 cm, and many metastases occurred within 2 cm of the primary lesion. Multiple metastases were observed in 38 % of cases and occurred mainly in the submucosa and muscularis propria. IM was detected preoperatively in 17.2 % of cases and was present equally on both sides of the primary lesion. Nine cases had IM outside the stomach. The median survival time with IM was significantly less than in cases of advanced gastric cancer without IM (p < 0.0001). A subgroup of cases with IM within 1 cm of the primary lesion had a relatively favorable prognosis.

Conclusions: The presence of IM is thought to be one of the most important prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Aggressive resection is recommended to increase long-term survival if curative resection is possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Surg Today. 1998;28(11):1160-2 - PubMed
    1. Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):101-12 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1990 Apr 15;65(8):1816-9 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2002 May;34(5):418-20 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 1992 Jan 2;50(1):49-52 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources