Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes
- PMID: 23315059
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des462
Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes
Abstract
Study question: Are the morphokinetics of growing embryos affected by the type of culture media utilized?
Summary answer: Morphokinetic parameters used for embryo selection are not affected between the two different concept culture media analyzed.
What is known already: Studies on the effect of culture media on human embryos have focused on evaluating different in-house and commercially available media as well as comparing outcomes among different commercial media. Nonetheless, the evaluation of embryo development in these studies was based on static observations and very little is known from a dynamic point of view.
Study design, size, duration: Prospective cohort study, October 2010 and April 2011.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: University-affiliated infertility center. Patients undergoing egg donation (n = 75) in which embryos were cultured with two different types of media in a time-lapse system. Embryo development was analyzed with time-lapse imaging for single step media (Global®) and sequential media (Sage® Cleavage). Variables studied included the timing to two cells (t2), three cells (t3), four cells (t4) and five cells (t5) as well as the length of the second cell cycle (cc2 = t3 - t2) and the synchrony in the division from two to four cells (s2 = t4 - t3). Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were also analyzed.
Main results and the role of chance: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two media for all the variables analyzed. When analyzing the percentage of embryos falling within the optimal ranges proposed for s2, cc2 and t5, we did not find significant differences between the two media. Pregnancy and implantation rates were similar for the three types of transfers: 48.0% (CI 95% 28.4-67.6) and 42.0% (CI 95% 22.5-61.4) with Global media; 58.8% (CI 95% 35.4-82.2) and 38.2% (CI 95% 15.0-61.4) with Cleavage media; and 58.1% (CI 95% 40.7-75.4) and 37.1% (CI 95% 22.1-52.1) with mixed transferred, respectively. Multiple implantations (twins) were also similar among the three groups, with 24.0% (CI 95% 9.3-45.1) for transfers with embryos cultured in Global media, 17.6% (CI 95% 3.7-43.3) for transfers with embryos cultured in Cleavage media and 22.5% (CI 95% 9.5-41.0) with mixed transfers.
Limitations, reasons for caution: The study was not powered to test differences in pregnancy rates between the two culture media, as this was not the hypothesis tested. Results are based on observations with embryos from oocyte donors and need to be repeated with embryos from infertile patients of different ages.
Wider implications of the findings: The absence of differences in morphokinetics between two different media concepts validates the algorithm for embryo selection in diverse culture conditions.
Study funding/competing interest(s): No specific funding was obtained for this study; it was solely funded by IVI. None of the authors have any economic affiliation with Unisense Fertilitech A/S but IVI is a minor shareholder in Unisense Fertilitech A/S.
Similar articles
-
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection.Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):276-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu331. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25527613
-
Similar morphokinetic patterns in embryos derived from obese and normoweight infertile women: a time-lapse study.Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):794-800. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des438. Epub 2013 Jan 4. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23293223
-
Time-lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study.Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2643-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det300. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23900207 Clinical Trial.
-
Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics.Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 15;99(4):1030-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.089. Epub 2013 Feb 6. Fertil Steril. 2013. PMID: 23395415 Review.
-
Time-lapse embryo imaging technology: does it improve the clinical results?Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;26(3):138-44. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000072. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24752001 Review.
Cited by
-
Time-Lapse Embryo culture: A better understanding of embryo development and clinical application.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Aug 4;26(3):432-443. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210107. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35001523 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical outcomes of transfer of frozen and thawed single blastocysts derived from nonpronuclear and monopronuclear zygotes.Reprod Med Biol. 2019 May 15;18(3):278-283. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12275. eCollection 2019 Jul. Reprod Med Biol. 2019. PMID: 31312107 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized comparison of early embryo cleavage kinetics between two media culture systems.Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(6):1375-1379. doi: 10.12669/pjms.326.10809. Pak J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 28083029 Free PMC article.
-
Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Sep;35(9):1573-1583. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1265-7. Epub 2018 Jul 20. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID: 30030710 Free PMC article.
-
Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection.Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):77-84. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1728444. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Ups J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32096675 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous