Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;1(6):e005371.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.005371. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Status of cardiovascular health among adult Americans in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2009

Affiliations

Status of cardiovascular health among adult Americans in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2009

Jing Fang et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: With ideal cardiovascular health metrics, the American Heart Association established a goal of improving cardiovascular health for all Americans by 20% by 2020. Determining how the metrics vary by state is important to the individual states as well as to researchers and policy makers nationwide.

Methods and results: Using 2009 data from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based telephone survey with 356 441 eligible participants, we examined the 7 metrics defined by the American Heart Association: hypertension, high cholesterol, smoking, body mass index, diabetes, physical activity, and consumption of fruits and vegetables. The 3 primary outcomes of this study were (1) the percentage of the population achieving ideal health status on all 7 factors, (2) the percentage of the population with only 0 to 2 of the 7 metrics (poor cardiovascular health); and (3) the mean overall score (number of ideal metrics). Overall, 3.3% of population was in ideal cardiovascular health, and 9.9% was in poor cardiovascular health. The mean overall score was 4.42. The percentage with ideal cardiovascular health varied from 1.2% (Oklahoma) to 6.9% (District of Columbia ). The adjusted prevalence ratio of ideal cardiovascular health ranged from 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.52 (Oklahoma), to 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.42 (District of Columbia), with Illinois as the referent.

Conclusions: In the United States, the cardiovascular health status of the population varies substantially by state. The estimates here could help state programs charged with preventing heart disease and stroke to set their goals for reducing risk and improving cardiovascular health in their jurisdictions.

Keywords: cardiovascular health; epidemiology; states.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Age‐standardized cardiovascular health status by US states, BRFSS, 2009. A, Age‐standardized prevalence of population with ideal cardiovascular health by states. B, Age‐standardized percentage of population with 0 to 2 cardiovascular health metrics by states. C, Age‐standardized mean score of cardiovascular health metrics by states. BRFSS indicates Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adjusted prevalence ratio of ideal cardiovascular health by state, BRFSS, 2009. BRFSS indicates Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Adjusted prevalence ratio of ideal cardiovascular health by state, including patients with coronary heart disease and stroke, BRFSS, 2009. BRFSS indicates Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Comment in

References

    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd‐Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo DAmerican Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Heart disease and stroke statistics—2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 125:e2-e220 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miniño AM, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek D. Deaths: Final Data for 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2011. 59Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 10 - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD, Finkelstein EA, Hong Y, Johnston SC, Khera A, Lloyd‐Jones DM, Nelson SA, Nichol G, Orenstein D, Wilson PW, Woo YJ. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 123:933-944 - PubMed
    1. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, Critchley JA, Labarthe DR, Kottke TE, Giles WH, Capewell S. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:2388-2398 - PubMed
    1. Lloyd‐Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nichol G, Tomaselli GF, Arnett DK, Fonarow GC, Ho PM, Lauer MS, Masoudi FA, Robertson RM, Roger V, Schwamm LH, Sorlie P, Yancy CW, Rosamond WDAmerican Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010; 121:586-613 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources