Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jan-Feb;42(1):92-104.
doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12004.

Endotracheal suctioning in preterm infants using four-handed versus routine care

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Endotracheal suctioning in preterm infants using four-handed versus routine care

Sharon Cone et al. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of four-handed care on preterm infants' physiologic and behavioral responses to and recovery from endotracheal suctioning versus routine endotracheal (ETT) suctioning.

Design: Randomized crossover design with infants as their own controls.

Setting: Single-family-room newborn intensive care unit in an academic health center.

Participants: Ten intubated infants on conventional ventilation with inline suctioning who were fewer than 37 weeks gestation at birth, and less than one week of age.

Methods: Each infant was observed twice on a single day. One observation involved routine ETT suctioning and one involved four-handed care. Physiologic and behavioral response data were collected.

Results: No differences were noted when comparing baseline heart rate (HR) or oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) data to those obtained during and after suctioning while in the routine care condition. In the four-handed care condition, mean SpO(2) increased from preobservation 95.49 to during observation saturation 97.75 (p = .001). Salivary cortisol levels did not differ between groups at baseline or postsuctioning. No significant difference in behavior state was observed between the two conditions. More stress and defense behaviors occurred postsuctioning when infants received routine care as opposed to four-handed care (p = .001) and more self-regulatory behaviors were exhibited by infants during (p = .019) and after suctioning (p = .016) when receiving four-handed care. No statistical difference was found in the number of monitor call-backs postsuctioning.

Conclusions: Four-handed care during suctioning was associated with a decrease in stress and defense behaviors and an increase in self-regulatory behaviors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest or relevant financial relationships.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Counts of Self-Regulatory Behaviors Before, During, and After Suctioning in Routine vs. Four-Handed Care Condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Counts of Stress and Defense Behaviors Before, During, and After Suctioning in Routine vs. Four-Handed Care Condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acolet D, Modi N, Giannokoulopoulos X, Bond C, Weg W, Clow A, Glover V. Changes in plasma cortisol and cate-choloamine concentrations in response to massage in preterm infants. Archives of Diseases in Childhood. 1993;68:29–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alpan G, Glick B, Peleg O, Amit Y, Eyal F. Pneumothorax due to endotracheal tube suction. American Journal of Perinatology. 1984;1:3345–3348. - PubMed
    1. Altimier L. Neonatal intensive care units (NICU) environment. In: Kenner C, Lott JW, editors. Comprehensive neonatal care: A physiologic perspective. St. Louis, MO: W.B. Saunders; 2007. pp. 480–490.
    1. Altimier L, Brown B, Tedeschi L. National Association of Neonatal Nurses guidelines for neonatal nursing policies, procedures, competencies and clinical pathways. Glenview, IL: National Association of Neonatal Nurses; 2006.
    1. Axelin A, Salantera S, Lehtonen L. Facilitated tucking by parents’ in pain management of preterm infants—A randomized crossover trial. Early Human Development. 2006;82:241–247. - PubMed

Publication types