Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 15:12:12.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-12.

Waist circumference vs body mass index in association with cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women: a cross sectional analysis of 403 subjects

Affiliations

Waist circumference vs body mass index in association with cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women: a cross sectional analysis of 403 subjects

Shiri Sherf Dagan et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Objective: Body mass index (BMI) is more commonly used than waist circumference as a measure of adiposity in clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to compare the associations of BMI and waist circumference with cardiorespiratory fitness.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study of 403 healthy men and women aged 50 ± 8.8 years, BMI and waist circumference were measured. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed from estimated maximal O2 uptake (VO2max), as calculated from a maximal fitness test.

Results: Mean BMI (kg/m2) was 27.8 ± 3.7 and 25.5 ± 4.6; and mean waist circumference (cm) 94.1 ± 9.7 and 84.3 ± 10.4 for men and women, respectively. Both men and women reported an average of 2.5 hours of weekly sports related physical activity, and 18% were current smokers. Correlation coefficients between both BMI and waist circumference, and VO2max were statistically significant in men (r= -0.280 and r= -0.377, respectively, p>0.05 for both) and in women (r= -0.514 and r= -0.491, respectively, p>0.05 for both). In women, the contribution of BMI to the level of VO2max in a regression model was greater, while in men waist circumference contributed more to the final model. In these models, age, hours of training per week, and weekly caloric expenditure in sport activity, significantly associated with VO2max, while smoking did not.

Conclusion: The differences observed between the sexes in the associations of BMI and waist circumference with VO2max support the clinical use of both obesity measures for assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The interaction between obesity indexes (BMI and waist circumference) and cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by calculated VO2max. A: The interaction between BMI and VO2max in men and women. For the for interaction between BMI*sex and VO2max in the adjusted multivariate linear regression models P = 0.057. Abbreviation: BMI = Body Mass Index. R2 - a measure of goodness-of-fit in linear regression. B: The interaction between waist circumference and VO2max in men and women. For the interaction between WC*sex and VO2max in the adjusted multivariate linear regression models P = 0.063. Abbreviation: WC = waist circumference. R2 - a measure of goodness-of-fit in linear regression.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown P. Waist circumference in primary care. Prim Care Diabetes. 2009;3(4):259–261. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.09.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB. Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO; Obesity Society; American Society for Nutrition; American Diabetes Association; Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO, the Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association et al.Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from shaping America’s health. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1647–1652. doi: 10.2337/dc07-9921. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seidell JC. Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio in relation to all-cause mortality, cancer and sleep apnea. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(1):35–41. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.71. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cornier MA, Després JP, Davis N. et al.Assessing adiposity: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2011;124:1996–2019. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318233bc6a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wannamethee SG, Papacosta O, Whincup PH. et al.Assessing prediction of diabetes in older adults using different adiposity measures: a 7 year prospective study in 6,923 older men and women. Diabetologia. 2010;53(5):890–898. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1670-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed