Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
- PMID: 23317141
- PMCID: PMC3561262
- DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-2
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery.
Methods: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors.
Results: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication.
Conclusions: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 8;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 26857448 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 16;15(10):e1002672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002672. eCollection 2018 Oct. PLoS Med. 2018. PMID: 30325928 Free PMC article.
-
How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):359-67. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Women Birth. 2016. PMID: 26846560
-
Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran.Reprod Health. 2016 Jan 23;13:7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0120-5. Reprod Health. 2016. PMID: 26801087 Free PMC article.
-
What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.Women Birth. 2020 Jul;33(4):323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31607640
Cited by
-
Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.BJOG. 2018 Sep;125(10):1294-1302. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15122. Epub 2018 Feb 22. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 29325216 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of Conducting a Trial Assessing Benefits and Risks of Planned Caesarean Section Versus Planned Vaginal Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study.Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jan;25(1):136-150. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03073-4. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Matern Child Health J. 2021. PMID: 33392930 Free PMC article.
-
Preference and determinants of delivery mode in pregnant women with one cesarean scar: a cross-sectional study in two urban Ugandan public hospitals.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07263-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 39915826 Free PMC article.
-
Individual and Group Psycho-Educational Counseling on Knowledge, Attitude and Preference for Birth Method in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Family Reprod Health. 2018 Jun;12(2):103-110. J Family Reprod Health. 2018. PMID: 30820214 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring First-time Pregnant Women's Motivations for Planning Vaginal Delivery: A Qualitative Study.Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):465-470. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_175_17. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018. PMID: 30386397 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical