Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 14:11:7.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-7.

Does quality of life assessment in palliative care look like a complex screening program?

Gianluca Catania  1 , Massimo Costantini, Monica Beccaro, Annamaria Bagnasco, Loredana Sasso
Affiliations

Does quality of life assessment in palliative care look like a complex screening program?

Gianluca Catania et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Palliative Care (PC) is an approach that improves the Quality of Life (QoL). A number of QoL assessment tools have been developed and validated in PC. It is not clear how QoL should be measured in PC practice. A procedure of QoL assessment in clinical practice can be defined as a clinical intervention focused on QoL assessment. This is a typical complex intervention that should be appropriately developed and described in all its components and assessed for its effectiveness. The aim of this study is to define a framework to help researchers to develop and evaluate clinical interventions focused on QoL assessment in PC.

Methods: A study group of experts in PC and in research methodology was set up to define a framework that would describe the principles of clinical interventions focused on QoL assessment in PC. The study group discussed the WHO Population Screening Principles as a possible useful framework. The new principles had to be developed taking into account the following criteria: 1) specific to PC practice; 2) address a single underlying characteristic; 3) anchored to relevant literature; 4) consistent with the WHO PC definition.With regard to contents and the format of the principles, discussions occurred among the study group members through a cognitive process.

Results: We reviewed each of the WHO Population Screening Principles and adapted them to QoL assessment, taking into account the defined criteria. As a result, a new framework, the QoL Assessment Principles in Palliative Care was developed. It consisted of 4 sections, for a total of 11 principles.

Conclusions: The WHO Screening Principles framework was used to outline the eleven essential principles to be considered in developing and/or evaluating clinical interventions focused on QoL assessment in PC. The QoL Assessment Principles in Palliative Care identified could represent a methodological and ethical standard to be considered when developing and evaluating a clinical intervention focused on QoL assessment in PC.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) definition of Palliative Care. World Health Organization (WHO) definition of Palliative Care. Geneva: WHO; 2002. http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the world health organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–1409. - PubMed
    1. Calman KC. Quality of life in cancer patients: a hypothesis. J Med Ethics. 1984;10:124–127. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.3.124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowling A. In: Quality of life. 1. Carr AJ, Higginson IJ, Robinson PG, editor. London: BMJ Books; 2003. Current state of the art in quality of life assessment; pp. 1–8.
    1. Kaasa S, Loge JH. In: Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. 3. Doyle D, Hanks G, Cherny N, Calman K, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. Quality of life in palliative medicine – principles and practice; pp. 196–210.

MeSH terms