Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;15(2):124-8.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0229. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

Frequency of mealtime insulin bolus as a proxy measure of adherence for children and youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Frequency of mealtime insulin bolus as a proxy measure of adherence for children and youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Susana R Patton et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Electronic measures of adherence can be superior to patient report. In type 1 diabetes, frequency of blood glucose monitoring (BGM), as measured by patients' home blood glucose meters, has already been identified as a valid proxy of adherence. We present methodology to calculate adherence using insulin pump records and evaluate the reliability and validity of this methodology.

Subjects and methods: Blood glucose meter data, insulin pump records, and corresponding hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were randomly gathered from clinical and research databases for 100 children and youths (referred to hereafter as youths) with type 1 diabetes (mean±SD age, 12.7±4.6 years). Youths' mean frequency of daily BGM was calculated. Additionally, we calculated a mean mealtime insulin bolus score (BOLUS): youths received 1 point each for a bolus between 0600 and 1000 h, 1100 and 1500 h, and 1600 and 2200 h (maximum of 1 point/meal or 3 points/day).

Results: Simple correlations between youths' HbA1c level, age, frequency of BGM, and insulin BOLUS scores were all significant. Partial correlations and multiple regression analyses revealed that insulin BOLUS scores better explain variations in HbA1c levels than the electronically recorded frequency of daily blood glucose measures.

Conclusions: Our procedures for calculating insulin BOLUS scores using insulin pump records demonstrate better concurrent validity with youths' HbA1c levels than that of the frequency of BGM with youths' HbA1c levels. Our analyses have shown that insulin bolus scoring was superior to the frequency of BGM in predicting youths' HbA1c levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hood KK. Peterson CM. Rohan JM. Drotar D. Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e1171–e1179. - PubMed
    1. Silverstein J. Klingensmith G. Copeland K. Plotnick L. Kaufman F. Laffel L. Deeb L. Grey M. Anderson B. Holzmeister LA. Clark N. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:186–212. - PubMed
    1. Kichler JC. Kaugars AS. Maglio K. Alemzadeh R. Exploratory analysis of the relationships among different methods of assessing adherence and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Health Psychol. 2012;31:35–42. - PubMed
    1. Rapoff MA. Adherence to Pediatric Medical Regimens. 2nd. New York: Springer; 2010.
    1. Rausch JR. Hood KK. Delamater A. Shroff Pendley J. Rohan JM. Reeves G. Dolan L. Drotar D. Changes in treatment adherence and glycemic control during the transition to adolescence in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1219–1224. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types