Uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatment using AMARIS with the PresbyMAX module
- PMID: 23317648
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.023
Uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatment using AMARIS with the PresbyMAX module
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric multifocal central presbyopic laser in situ keratomileusis treatments.
Design: Retrospective, interventional case series.
Methods: setting. Private clinical practice. patient or study population. Three hundred fifty-eight presbyopic patients (43% males, 82 myopic), bilaterally treated, suitable for laser in situ keratomileusis, with monocular corrected distance visual acuity of 20/32 or better. intervention or observation procedure(s). PresbyMAX (Schwind Eye-Tech-Solutions GmbH and Co) biaspheric multifocal ablation. main outcome measures. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) after surgery and their changes compared with corrected distance visual acuity and corrected near visual acuity before surgery.
Results: At 6 months, 76% of patients achieved a UDVA of 0.1 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/25) or better, 91% of patients obtained a UNVA of 0.1 logarithmic of the reading acuity determination (logRAD) (p3) or better, and 99% of patients were within 1 diopter of defocus. Postoperative mean spherical equivalent was -0.17 ± 0.34 diopter. Ninety-six percent of patients achieved a UDVA of 0.2 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/32) or better and a UNVA of 0.2 logRAD (p4) or better. Mean binocular corrected distance visual acuity degraded from 0.00 ± 0.01 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/20) to a UDVA of 0.09 ± 0.07 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/25). Mean binocular corrected near visual acuity degraded from 0.02 ± 0.01 logRAD (p2) to a UNVA of 0.07 ± 0.07 logRAD (p2).
Conclusions: Although optically the results are predictable, approximately 17% of the patients did not obtain objectively successful outcomes. In presbyopic patients without symptomatic cataracts, but with refractive errors, the PresbyMAX will decrease the presbyopic symptoms and correct far distance refraction in the same treatment, offering spectacle-free vision in daily life in most of the patients. Further investigation is necessary to evaluate the overall benefit of this procedure.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Uncorrected binocular performance after biaspheric ablation profile (PresbyMAX) for presbyopic corneal treatment.Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;156(4):847-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.07.005. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 24053893 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 23317648.Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;156(4):848-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.07.004. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 24053896 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;250(11):1649-61. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1948-1. Epub 2012 Feb 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22350057
-
One-year experience in presbyopia correction with biaspheric multifocal central presbyopia laser in situ keratomileusis.Cornea. 2013 May;32(5):644-52. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825f02f5. Cornea. 2013. PMID: 23086358
-
Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments.Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;160(3):493-505. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 May 27. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 26025425
-
Presbyopic Excimer Laser Ablation: A Review.J Refract Surg. 2018 Oct 1;34(10):698-710. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180726-02. J Refract Surg. 2018. PMID: 30296331 Review.
-
PresbyLASIK approach for the correction of presbyopia.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;26(4):265-72. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000162. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 26058023 Review.
Cited by
-
Early Outcomes of Two Treatment Modes of PresbyLASIK: Monocular vs. Micro-Monovision.Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 1;16:3597-3606. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384553. eCollection 2022. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 36345532 Free PMC article.
-
Objective optical quality and visual outcomes after the PresbyMAX monocular ablation profile.Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 18;13(7):1060-1065. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.07.07. eCollection 2020. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32685392 Free PMC article.
-
One Year Outcome and Satisfaction of Presbyopia Correction Using the PresbyMAX® Monocular Ablation Profile.Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 27;7:589275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.589275. eCollection 2020. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020. PMID: 33330548 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and effectiveness of the SUPRACOR presbyopic LASIK algorithm on hyperopic patients.Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Dec 8;3:33. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0062-6. eCollection 2016. Eye Vis (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27981059 Free PMC article.
-
Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):413-418. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_162_16. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017. PMID: 29090052 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources