Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of perioperative complications and anatomical outcomes
- PMID: 23318069
- PMCID: PMC3535800
- DOI: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736132
Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of perioperative complications and anatomical outcomes
Abstract
Background and objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacropexy with regard to 3 varying mesh attachment points: the vaginal stump, the cervical stump, and the posterior side of the cervix in the case of uterus preservation.
Method: A retrospective study was conducted among 310 women treated for descensus with laparoscopic sacropexy between January 2000 and December 2007. Information was obtained from medical files and follow-up examinations.
Results: Sacropexies with mesh attachment to the cervical stump, to the vaginal stump, and with uterus preservation were performed in 213, 67, and 30 cases, respectively. In 40 cases, no concomitant interventions were necessary. One perioperative conversion and 2 terminations occurred. Short-term complications included fever in 15 cases and urinary incontinence in 7 cases. Average follow-up was 7.9 mo with 211 patients completing followup. Prolapse recurrence rate was 10.4%; the reoperation rate was 4%. No significant differences between groups were detected for cystocele recurrence. Rectocele recurrence was significantly higher (P < .05) for sacropexy with vaginal mesh attachment. A reduction of incontinence was observed, which was significant (P < .05) for those patients treated with simultaneous or previous hysterectomy.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic sacropexy shows good short-term results with low reprolapse and complication rates.
Figures






Similar articles
-
[PROSPERE randomized controlled trial: laparoscopic sacropexy versus vaginal mesh for cystocele POP repair].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Jun;42(4):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 22. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013. PMID: 23618743 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Laparoscopic management of uterine prolapse with cystocele and rectocele using "Gynemesh PS".J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):93-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0026. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008. PMID: 18266583
-
Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):712-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.017. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17980331
-
The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review.Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19201521 Review.
-
[Prolapse surgery: vaginal mesh or sacropexy].Urologe A. 2011 Jul;50(7):798-801. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2608-5. Urologe A. 2011. PMID: 21725648 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Intermediate-term follow-up of laparoscopic pectopexy cases and their effects on sexual function and quality of life: a cross-sectional study.Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jul-Aug;140(4):583-587. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0488.R1.171121. Sao Paulo Med J. 2022. PMID: 35674612 Free PMC article.
-
Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It.Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Nov;35(11):2107-2123. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05922-0. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. PMID: 39404818 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Curr Urol Rep. 2022 Sep;23(9):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01101-0. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Curr Urol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35789456 Review.
-
Modified laparoscopic pectopexy: short-term follow-up and its effects on sexual function and quality of life.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1155-1160. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3565-y. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29500516
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal prolapse among the global population.BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 10;6(1):e464. doi: 10.1002/bco2.464. eCollection 2025 Jan. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39877583 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dowell CJ, Bryant CM, Moore KH, Simons AM. Calculating the direct cost of urinary incontinence: a new test instrument. BJU Int. 1999; 83 (6): 596–606 - PubMed
-
- Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002(June);186(6):1160–1166 - PubMed
-
- Benson J, Lucente M, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 175(6): 1418–1421, 1996. December; discussion 1421–1422 - PubMed
-
- Arthure HG, Savage D. Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957; 64 (3): 355–360 - PubMed
-
- Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of lapaorscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009. May; 55(5): 1089–1103 Epub 2009 Feb 4. Review - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical