Inhibitory control test, critical flicker frequency, and psychometric tests in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
- PMID: 23319037
- PMCID: PMC3603489
- DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.105924
Inhibitory control test, critical flicker frequency, and psychometric tests in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis
Abstract
Background/aim: Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) impairs health-related quality of life and driving ability of the patient.
Objective: We assessed the utility of the inhibitory control test (ICT), critical flicker frequency (CFF), and psychometry in the diagnosis of MHE.
Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with cirrhosis underwent number connection tests A and B (NCT-A, B), digit symbol test (DST), line tracing test (LTT), serial dot test (SDT), CFF, and ICT at baseline and after four hours. Fifty healthy subjects served as controls for the ICT test.
Results: Fifty patients with cirrhosis (43.4 ± 10.2 yrs, M: F 42:8) underwent psychometric tests [NCT-A (48.3 ± 17.7 vs. 42.6 ± 17.3 sec, P = 0.001), NCT-B (85.7 ± 40.1 vs. 90.2 ± 37.0 sec, P = 0.18), DST (23.5 ± 9.3 vs. 23.0 ± 8.7, P = 0.45), LTT (96.6 ± 48.2 vs. 96.8 ± 46.8 sec, P = 0.92), SDT (88.0 ± 39.5 vs. 83.4 ± 37.2 sec, P = 0.02)] at baseline and after four hours. Target accuracy of ICT was lower in patients with cirrhosis compared with controls (88.4 ± 5.6 vs. 95.6 ± 2.1, P = 0.01), whereas ICT lures were higher (18.3 ± 4.2 vs 10.2 ± 2.8, P = 0.01). Patients with cirrhosis showed a reduction in lures in the second evaluation compared with the first (18.3 ± 4.2 vs. 17.1 ± 4.3, P = 0.003) but no change in target accuracy (88.4 ± 5.6 vs. 88.4 ± 5.3, P = 0.97). Control subjects did not show any change either in lures (10.2 ± 2.8 vs. 10.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.65) or target accuracy (95.6 ± 2.1 vs. 95.5 ± 2.2, P = 0.82). The sensitivity and specificity of ICT test for the diagnosis of MHE at lure rate >16.5 was 88.5 and 56%, respectively. CFF in patients with MHE (38.4 ± 1.8 vs. 38.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.3) and non MHE (40.6 ± 2.2 vs. 40.8 ± 2.2, P = 0.6) did not show any difference after four hours as in controls (41.9 ± 2.4 vs. 42.1 ± 2.0, P = 0.3). Thirty one (31%) patients preferred psychometric tests, 57 (57%) preferred CFF and only 12 (12%) preferred ICT ( P = 0.001).
Conclusions: ICT, CFF, and psychometric tests are useful tools to assess MHE, and CFF was preferred by this study cohort.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Advances in psychometric tests for screening minimal hepatic encephalopathy: From paper-and-pencil to computer-aided assessment.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;30(5):398-407. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.18226. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31060994 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients with Alcohol Related and Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Related Cirrhosis by Psychometric Hepatic Cephalopathy Score and Critical Flicker Frequency.Acta Med Indones. 2021 Jan;53(1):24-30. Acta Med Indones. 2021. PMID: 33818404
-
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis by measuring liver stiffness and hepatic venous pressure gradient.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):316-21. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.101126. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23006459 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the inhibitory control task to detect minimal hepatic encephalopathy.Gastroenterology. 2010 Aug;139(2):510-8, 518.e1-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.057. Epub 2010 May 11. Gastroenterology. 2010. PMID: 20470775
-
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy: diagnosis by neuropsychological and neurophysiologic methods.Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;22 Suppl 2:S37-41. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 15025253 Review.
Cited by
-
Novel computerized psychometric tests as primary screening tools for the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy.World J Clin Cases. 2020 Aug 26;8(16):3377-3389. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3377. World J Clin Cases. 2020. PMID: 32913845 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in psychometric tests for screening minimal hepatic encephalopathy: From paper-and-pencil to computer-aided assessment.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;30(5):398-407. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.18226. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31060994 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests.Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.6. Epub 2018 Mar 13. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29533396
-
Pitch Processing Can Indicate Cognitive Alterations in Chronic Liver Disease: An fNIRS Study.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 8;14:535775. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.535775. eCollection 2020. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33132872 Free PMC article.
-
How to diagnose and manage hepatic encephalopathy: a consensus statement on roles and responsibilities beyond the liver specialist.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;28(2):146-52. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000529. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 26600154 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ferenci P, Lockwood A, Mullen K, Tarter R, Weissenborn K, Blei AT. Hepatic encephalopahy—definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: Final report of the working party at the 11th World Congress of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology. 2002;35:716–21. - PubMed
-
- Romero-Gomez M, Boza F, Garcia-Valdecasas MS, García E, Aguilar-Reina J. Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy predicts the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2718–23. - PubMed
-
- Das A, Dhiman RK, Saraswat VA, Verma M, Naik SR. Prevalence and natural history of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:531–5. - PubMed
-
- Hartmann IJ, Groeneweg M, Quero JC, Beijeman SJ, de Man RA, Hop WC, et al. The prognostic significance of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2029–34. - PubMed
-
- Prasad S, Dhiman RK, Duseja A, Chawla YK, Sharma A, Agarwal R. Lactulose improves cognitive functions and health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis who have minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2007;45:549–59. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical