Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;20(2):243-68.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0369-9.

Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension

Affiliations
Review

Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension

David Caplan et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Efforts to characterize the memory system that supports sentence comprehension have historically drawn extensively on short-term memory as a source of mechanisms that might apply to sentences. The focus of these efforts has changed significantly in the past decade. As a result of changes in models of short-term working memory (ST-WM) and developments in models of sentence comprehension, the effort to relate entire components of an ST-WM system, such as those in the model developed by Baddeley (Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4: 829-839, 2003) to sentence comprehension has largely been replaced by an effort to relate more specific mechanisms found in modern models of ST-WM to memory processes that support one aspect of sentence comprehension--the assignment of syntactic structure (parsing) and its use in determining sentence meaning (interpretation) during sentence comprehension. In this article, we present the historical background to recent studies of the memory mechanisms that support parsing and interpretation and review recent research into this relation. We argue that the results of this research do not converge on a set of mechanisms derived from ST-WM that apply to parsing and interpretation. We argue that the memory mechanisms supporting parsing and interpretation have features that characterize another memory system that has been postulated to account for skilled performance-long-term working memory. We propose a model of the relation of different aspects of parsing and interpretation to ST-WM and long-term working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Rewrite rules from Lewis and Vasishth (2005, Fig. 3)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Word recall as function of serial position in different prose types, adapted from Marslen Wilson and Tyler (1978), Fig. 1

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acheson DJ, MacDonald MC. The rhymes that the reader perused confused the meaning: Phonological effects during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 2011;65:193–207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alcocer P, Phillips C. Using relational syntactic constraints in content-addressable memory architectures for sentence processing. (unpublished manuscript) Available at http://ling.umd.edu/~colin/research/
    1. Anderson JR. Language, memory, and thought. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976.
    1. Anderson JR, Fincham JM. Acquisition of Procedural skills from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994;20:1322–1340. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JR, Fincham JM, Douglass S. Practice and retention: A unifying analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1999;25:1120–1136. - PubMed

Publication types