Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):67-74.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1445.

Primary care physicians' use of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening

Affiliations

Primary care physicians' use of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening

Robert J Volk et al. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Leading professional organizations acknowledge the importance of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening. We describe primary care physicians' reports of their prescreening discussions about the potential harms and benefits of prostate cancer screening.

Methods: Members of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network responded to a survey that included (1) an indicator of practice styles related to discussing harms and benefits of prostate-specific antigen testing and providing a screening recommendation or letting patients decide, and (2) indicators reflecting physicians' beliefs about prostate cancer screening. The survey was conducted between July 2007 and January 2008.

Results: Of 426 physicians 246 (57.7%) completed the survey questionnaire. Compared with physicians who ordered screening without discussion (24.3%), physicians who discussed harms and benefits with patients and then let them decide (47.7%) were more likely to endorse beliefs that scientific evidence does not support screening, that patients should be told about the lack of evidence, and that patients have a right to know the limitations of screening; they were also less likely to endorse the belief that there was no need to educate patients because they wanted to be screened. Concerns about medicolegal risk associated with not screening were more common among physicians who discussed the harms and benefits and recommended screening than among physicians who discussed screening and let their patients decide.

Conclusions: Much of the variability in physicians' use of an informed decision-making process can be attributed to beliefs about screening. Concerns about medicolegal risk remain an important barrier for shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing participation of American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network members.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Practice styles for prostate cancer screening among American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network physician members (n = 243).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moyer VA. Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157 (2):120–134 - PubMed
    1. Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. ; American Cancer Society Prostate Cancer Advisory Committee American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):70–98 - PubMed
    1. Spann SJ. Prostate cancer screening—what’s a physician to do? Am Fam Physician 1997;56(6):1563–4, 67–8 - PubMed
    1. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(4):635–641 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunn AS, Shridharani KV, Lou W, Bernstein J, Horowitz CR. Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(2):130–134 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms